On 12/08/14 18:03, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 12/08/14 16:16, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> On 12/08/14 16:11, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> On 12/08/14 15:22, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/12/14 04:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 12/08/14 10:39, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:56
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:57:31PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> The problem with the frankenmonster patterns is that they tend to
> proliferate into the machine description, and before you know where you
> are the back-end is full of them.
>
> Furthermore, they are very sensitive to the greedy
> Hi Honza,
>
> I did not find any differences in tree level dumps. These are the dump
> differences in IPA
>
> In gimple-fold.c.000i.cgraph
>
> (--Snip--)
> < _Z25gimple_build_omp_continueP9tree_nodeS0_/761
> (gimple_build_omp_continue(tree_node*, tree_node*)) @0x3ff7ebda548
> ---
> > _Z25gimp
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140813 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140813/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
