I was wondering if it was a good idea to implement
predicate on expressions ?
Sth like:
(match_and_simplify
(op (op2:predicate @0))
transform)
instead of:
(match_and_simplify
(op (op2@1 @0))
if (predicate (@1))
transform)
When predicate is simple as just being a macro/function,
we coul
Hi Chris, no way!
It is like if gcc do not take in account of my BUILD_CFLAGS="-g -O2
-fbracket-depth=1024“
I even tried N=2048!
/opt/uKOS/Packages/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/config/arm/neon.md:3486:10917: fatal error:
bracket nesting level exceeded maximum of 256
/opt/uKOS/Packages/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/config
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> I was wondering if it was a good idea to implement
> predicate on expressions ?
>
> Sth like:
> (match_and_simplify
> (op (op2:predicate @0))
> transform)
>
> instead of:
> (match_and_simplify
> (op (op2@1 @0))
> if (predicate
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Franzi Edo. wrote:
> It is like if gcc do not take in account of my BUILD_CFLAGS="-g -O2
> -fbracket-depth=1024“
GCC meanwhile is compiled with c++. Instead of CFLAGS use CXXFLAGS. I.e.
BUILD_CXXFLAGS, and so on. No guarantees, but at least foobar_CFLAGS only
shoul
Hi,
For a simple example like below.
int
f1 (int p, short i, short n)
{
int sum = 0;
do
{
sum += i;
i++;
}
while (i < n);
return sum;
}
When compiling with -O2 -fdump-tree-all options, GCC introduces
unsigned type at the very beginning of gimple pass, for example, th
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 8:57 AM, "Bin.Cheng" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> For a simple example like below.
>
> int
> f1 (int p, short i, short n)
> {
> int sum = 0;
>
> do
>{
> sum += i;
> i++;
This here is the same as i = i + 1; which is really
i = (short)(((int)i) + 1);
So it gets conve
I have a multilib question that I hope someone can help me with.
If I have this multilib setup while building a cross compiler:
MULTILIB_DEFAULTS { "mips32r2" }
MULTILIB_OPTIONS = mips32r2/mips64r2
MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = ../lib ../lib64
Everything works the way I want it to. I have mips32r2 syst
Hi Michael (all),
Thank you for that!
Unfortunately, even with BUILD_CXXFLAGS I have the same error ….
Ciao Edo
On 14 Jul 2014, at 16:53, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Franzi Edo. wrote:
>
>> It is like if gcc do not take in account of my BUILD_CFLAGS="-g -O2
>> -fbracke
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> I was wondering if it was a good idea to implement
>> predicate on expressions ?
>>
>> Sth like:
>> (match_and_simplify
>> (op (op2:predicate @0))
>> transform)
>>
>> ins
