Re: [GSoC] symbol to denote multiple operators

2014-07-11 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, >I have attempted to add syntax for symbol to denote multiple operators. > > I tried it with few bogus patterns and it appears to work hopefully -:) > eg: (bogus pattern): > (for op in plus minus > (match_and_simplify >

Re: mn10300, invariants on DEP_PRO/DEP_CON and on TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST params

2014-07-11 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 10:13 +1200, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:21 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > [CCing nickc, who wrote the mn10300 hook in question] > > > > I'm experimenting with separating out instructions from expressions in > > RTL; see [1] for more info on that. > > > >

Re: GCC 4.9.1 Status Report (2014-07-10)

2014-07-11 Thread Franzi Edo.
Hi All, Thank you for your suggestions. Unfortunately, no way! I tried these actions: 1. using apple-gcc4.2 for building my cross gcc compiler 2. I tried XCode (llvm) 3. I tried to add this make CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fbracket-depth=512” (512, 1024, 2048 … no way)! 4. I can generate my cross co

Linux Plumbers Development Tools Microconference

2014-07-11 Thread Julia Lawall
Hello, I am organizing a Development Tools microconference at the 2014 Linux Plumbers conference: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2014/ http://wiki.linuxplumbersconf.org/2014:development_tools_coccinelle_sparse_etc The goal is both to share information about tools that may be relevant to Linu

Re: GCC 4.9.1 Status Report (2014-07-10)

2014-07-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/07/2014 4:52 am, Franzi Edo. wrote: make CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fbracket-depth=512” (512, 1024, 2048 … no way)! For a cross-compiler I think this should be BUILD_CFLAGS and I suggest 1024 rather than 512 ? Chris