[GSoC] How to get started with the isl code generation

Hi Roman, as you already look very actively through the graphite code, I was wondering if you already have an idea how to start with the implementation? It is obviously a good idea to first browse the code and get a general picture of the existing implementation as it helps to get a good pictu

Re: Improving Asan code on ARM targets

Andrew Pinski wrote: > Yury Gribov wrote: >> Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> Yury Gribov wrote: I've recently noticed that GCC generates suboptimal code for Asan on ARM targets. E.g. for a 4-byte memory access check >>> >>> Does the patch series at located at: >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 05/05/2014 21:11, Roman Gareev wrote: >> >> Hi Tobias, >> >> thank you for your reply! I have questions about types. Could you >> please answer them? > > > I looked through them and most seem to be related to how we derive types in > graph

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

On 06/05/2014 10:19, Richard Biener wrote: Hi Richi, thanks for the comments. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: On 05/05/2014 21:11, Roman Gareev wrote: Hi Tobias, thank you for your reply! I have questions about types. Could you please answer them? I looked through

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > I am busy for the next 6 weeks, but am planning to work on the isl patch > after. Sven, do you happen to have any time to work on the isl patch? No. It's going to be difficult enough for me to finish what I need to finish for the C

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 06/05/2014 10:19, Richard Biener wrote: > > Hi Richi, > > thanks for the comments. > > >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> >>> On 05/05/2014 21:11, Roman Gareev wrote: Hi Tobias, thank you

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

On 06/05/2014 13:52, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: On 06/05/2014 10:19, Richard Biener wrote: Hi Richi, thanks for the comments. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: On 05/05/2014 21:11, Roman Gareev wrote: Hi Tobias, th

Resurrecting -Wunreachable

I would like to resurrect -Wunreachable, using an algorithm which is roughly based on the Java rules for reachable statements and normal completion, augmented to deal with labels and gotos, no-return functions, statement expressions, and whatever else is relevant to C and C++. This analysis wo

Re: Resurrecting -Wunreachable

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I would like to resurrect -Wunreachable, using an algorithm which is roughly > based on the Java rules for reachable statements and normal completion, > augmented to deal with labels and gotos, no-return functions, statement > expressions, an

we are starting the wide int merge

please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we have a very large merge to do. thanks. kenny

Best Affordable Web Hosting

Hello, Are you looking for web hosting for your website. We are providing virtual private server in linux and windows for website which need better web hosting environment. Virtual private server provide isolated environment and suitable for sites which need more resources and custom settings.

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

On May 6, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > please hold off on committing patches for the next couple of hours as we have > a very large merge to do. > thanks. All done… It is in.

Go frontend no longer includes GCC header files

I'm very pleased to report that, thanks to the hard work of Chris Manghane, the Go frontend no longer includes any header files from GCC. This means that global changes to the GCC middle-end no longer need to touch any files in gcc/go/gofrontend. Instead, they will only need to modify files in gc

GNU Tools Cauldron 2014 - Update

An update to this year's Cauldron: - We have been able to accept everyone in the registration waiting list! If you were in the waiting list but have not yet received a confirmation, please contact us at tools-cauldron-ad...@googlegroups.com. - If you need a travel visa for the UK, please c

Re: SH -ml not turning into -EL to ld

Joel Sherrill wrote: > We have a few build failures on the RTEMS target where it appears > that the -ml argument to make a relocatable is not turned into a > -EL argument to ld by gcc 4.8.2. > > This is the output of invoking gcc with "-v". Below that I invoked > the same LD command with -EL on t