On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 06:25 AM, Vladimir Kargov wrote:
>>
>> On 27 March 2014 18:39, Mircea Namolaru wrote:
>>>
>>> The domain is computed on basis of the information provided by
>>> number_of_latch_execution that returns the tree expression
>>>
>>
On 03/31/2014 05:44 AM, dw wrote:
> So, after looking over this discussion, I have updated the text. This
> time no undefined terms, while still conveying all the points I had in mind:
>
> The "memory" clobber tells the compiler that the assembly code performs
> memory reads or writes to items o
On 03/31/2014 10:10 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 03/31/2014 06:25 AM, Vladimir Kargov wrote:
Regarding this bug there are two directions to go:
1) It is necessary to understand if we need to do wrapping on the result of
number_of_latch_exe
Hi,
In our ARC port, we found the following situation after expand:
(insn 23 22 24 5 (set (reg:SI 176)
(subreg:SI (mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 147 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -268 [0xfef4])) [3
tmpoutst.st_size+0 S8 A32]) 4)) t02.c:64 -1
(nil))
Th
Hi Vladmir,
I think that IRA should give the same result with the same RTL
input. But I find that this is not always true.
I test IRA with two inputs, say X and Y. The RTL insns are the
same (ignore the UIDs). And the only difference between the two is the
CFG.
There are two blocks in
> In our ARC port, we found the following situation after expand:
>
> (insn 23 22 24 5 (set (reg:SI 176)
> (subreg:SI (mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 147 virtual-stack-vars)
> (const_int -268 [0xfef4])) [3
> tmpoutst.st_size+0 S8 A32]) 4)) t02.c:64 -1 (nil))
>
> So far I've been testing with hardware but I'm pretty sure I read
> somewhere about an RL78 simulator, which would be a useful addition.
> Does this simulator exist, and if so, how do I run the tests against it?
The simulator is part of the GDB build.
> I tried 'make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="-
