On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:34:09PM +0100, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 06:52 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> > On 23 July 2013 17:40, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> On 07/22/2013 02:59 AM, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> There are 42 test files (25 under gcc.dg) that specifies
> >>>
On 24 September 2013 02:22, Alan Modra wrote:
>
> Try compiling that testcase with -static rather than -Wl,--as-needed.
> You'll hit std::system_error just like you do here. I believe that is
> a libstdc++ bug, and can be solved by making libstdc++.a use strong
> references to pthread symbols from
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Try compiling that testcase with -static rather than -Wl,--as-needed.
> > You'll hit std::system_error just like you do here. I believe that is
> > a libstdc++ bug, and can be solved by making libstdc++.a use strong
> > reference
On 24 September 2013 13:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> It's the std::thread constructor template that needs pthread_create.
>> std::thread::join() needs pthread_join.
>
> Are any references to that needed in libstdc++.so.6, or just in
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 13:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> It's the std::thread constructor template that needs pthread_create.
> >> std::thread::join() needs pthread_j
On 24 September 2013 13:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 24 September 2013 13:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >> It's the std::thread constructor template that needs pt
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:25:32AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This post details some thoughts on an enhancement to the vectorizer that
> > > could take advantage of the SIMD ins
I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
(GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
for announcements and highlights of interesting mailing list
discussions.
https://plus.google.com/108467477471815191158
https://twitter.com/gnutools
Anyone in
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33:31AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
> for announcements and highlights of interesting mailing list
> discussions.
>
> https://pl
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
What about covering glibc there as well?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Vidya Praveen wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This post details some thoughts on an enhancement to the vectorizer that
> > could take advantage of the SIMD instructions that allows indexed element
> > as an operand thus
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
>> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
>
> What about covering glibc there as well?
I wi
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
> for announcements and highlights of interesting mailing list
> discussions.
Thanks David. Defini
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
>> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
>> for announcements and highlights of i
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 07:39 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Well, it's really backend code that works out what registers need
> to be saved and restored, although it's based on generic information.
> So it should just be a case of making mips_save_reg_p return true for
> all FP registers in an f
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 07:39 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Well, it's really backend code that works out what registers need
>> to be saved and restored, although it's based on generic information.
>> So it should just be a case of making mips_save_reg_p return true for
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 02:22, Alan Modra wrote:
> >
> > Try compiling that testcase with -static rather than -Wl,--as-needed.
> > You'll hit std::system_error just like you do here. I believe that is
> > a libstdc++ bug, and can be s
17 matches
Mail list logo
