Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction.

2013-08-14 Thread Viktor Pobedin
On 8/13/2013 10:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Viktor Pobedin writes: Is there a simple way to convert rtx object to the assemble insutruction? Ideally I would like to have function something like: const char *rtx2asm(rtx insn); returning a string with the asm instruction for the insn.

Re: Combine pass with reused sources

2013-08-14 Thread amylaar
Quoting "Lu, John" : However, if I modify the function so that one of the factors is reused, long f1(long a, long b, long c) { res0=((long long) a)*((long long) b); res1=((long long) c)*((long long) b); } combine will not fuse the reused sign-extension result to generate th

Re: converting rtx object to the assembly instruction.

2013-08-14 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:53 +0300, Viktor Pobedin wrote: > On 8/13/2013 10:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Viktor Pobedin writes: > >> Is there a simple way to convert rtx object to the assemble > >> insutruction? Ideally I would like to have function something like: > >> const char *rtx

Re: [x86-64 psABI] RFC: Extend x86-64 PLT entry to support MPX

2013-08-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:49:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > There are 2 psABI considerations: > > 1. Should PLT entries in all binaries, with and without MPX, be changed > to 32-byte or just the necessary ones? Ugh, please don't. > 2. Only branch to PLT entry with BND prefix needs 32-byte P

Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file

2013-08-14 Thread Andreas Schwab
Alexandre Oliva writes: > FWIW, that patch was removed at a later point, for reasons I no longer > recall. See . Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5

Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file

2013-08-14 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > >> FWIW, that patch was removed at a later point, for reasons I no longer >> recall. > > See . So, we are over the 48-hour wait for complaints :-/ -- Gaby

Hello

2013-08-14 Thread Sergey Karaulnykh
Some time ago my family and I came to your town on vacation and stayed. We want to express to you our gratitude for your warm welcome and good service. Our children were very happy and satisfied your. My wife and I also had a great time and got a lot of positive emotions. Thank you once again fo

Re: HAVE_ATTR_enabled mishandling?

2013-08-14 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/8/14 Vladimir Makarov : > On 13-08-12 11:13 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: >> >> Hi, Vladimir, >> >> Apparently the issue that David mentioned has already been fixed earlier: >>http://gcc.gnu.org/r198344 >> >> 2013-04-26 Vladimir Makarov >> >> ... >> * lra-constraints.c (curr_in

Re: gfortran-dg-runtest, torture options

2013-08-14 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 13/08/2013 20:23, Janis Johnson a écrit : > On 08/13/2013 04:06 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I noticed something strange in the libgomp testresults (but not >> necessarily specific to libgomp): an "arbitrary" set of the Fortran >> execution tests are run just for -O, and others for ea

What does the RTX_FLAG volitil mean?

2013-08-14 Thread sculptor
In poking about the guts of gcc I noticed that the RTX_FLAG volitil seems to be set for some strange reasons... For instance. it's set for registers that receive the value of a parameter register in addition to being set for registers that were declared volatile in the C code. Note, this is not an

Re: What does the RTX_FLAG volitil mean?

2013-08-14 Thread pinskia
Sent from my iPad On Aug 14, 2013, at 9:01 PM, sculptor wrote: > In poking about the guts of gcc I noticed that the RTX_FLAG volitil seems to > be set for some strange reasons... For instance. it's set for registers that > receive the value of a parameter register in addition to being set for