Re: Can our C++ vectors hold derived classes?

2013-06-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi everyone, but especially Diego :-) > > it seems to me that our new C++ vectors have some problems holding > derived classes. For example, when try to compile the following > > struct zzzA > { > int kind; > }; > > struct zzzB :

Re: Can our C++ vectors hold derived classes?

2013-06-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus, > > it seems there is an error somewhere... or am I doing something wrong? > > I think you need to avoid using vl_embed vectors because their implementation > u

Re: Can our C++ vectors hold derived classes?

2013-06-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus, >> > it seems there is an error somewhere... or am I doing something wrong? >> >> I think you need to

Re: Can our C++ vectors hold derived classes?

2013-06-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:22:01AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus, > >> > it seems there is an erro

Re: Hurd port for GCC Go

2013-06-13 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:36:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 10:31 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:14:31 +0200, Svante Signell > > wrote: > > > Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian > > > GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.7 (4.7.3-4)

Can we somehow XFAIL libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx ?

2013-06-13 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, I don't remember seeing this testcase pass and the FAILs clutter the testsresults. Can we XFAIL it? Thanks, Paolo.

What's up with g++.dg/ext/mv*.C?

2013-06-13 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that? Thanks, Paolo.

Re: What's up with g++.dg/ext/mv*.C?

2013-06-13 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that? This is PR57548 and a patch is approved but unapplied: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00426.

Re: What's up with g++.dg/ext/mv*.C?

2013-06-13 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that? This is PR57548 and a patch is approved but unapplied: http:

Re: Can our C++ vectors hold derived classes?

2013-06-13 Thread Diego Novillo
On 2013-06-12 13:23 , Martin Jambor wrote: Hi everyone, but especially Diego :-) it seems to me that our new C++ vectors have some problems holding derived classes. For example, when try to compile the following The vec implementation in vec.[hc] must be a POD because we store vectors in uni

Доброго времени суток

2013-06-13 Thread admin
Вы будете зреть мир во любых его расцветках http://goo.gl/1R0Y0?/MhffOh Превосходно Мама что-то говорила, плакала, щупала меня, Принц обнюхивал мою руку, за которую брался оборотень, и рычал. Но все эти действия были от меня далеки, развивались как бы на втором плане. Мои мысли, хлынувшие сокру

Re: What's up with g++.dg/ext/mv*.C?

2013-06-13 Thread Sriraman Tallam
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> >> On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix >>> actively in the making? Do we have any sort of tim

Re: What's up with g++.dg/ext/mv*.C?

2013-06-13 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: > >>is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for > >>that? > >This is PR57548 and a patch is approved bu

Re: [Regression] d96ac6f2: time: Revert ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK compile time optimizaitons

2013-06-13 Thread Jens Taprogge
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:07:50AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/01/2013 11:45 AM, Jens Taprogge wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote: > >>On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:16:49PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > >>>On 05/31/2013 04:42 PM, Jens Taprogge wrote: > On F

gcc-4.8-20130613 is now available

2013-06-13 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130613 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130613/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches