On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi everyone, but especially Diego :-)
>
> it seems to me that our new C++ vectors have some problems holding
> derived classes. For example, when try to compile the following
>
> struct zzzA
> {
> int kind;
> };
>
> struct zzzB :
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus,
> > it seems there is an error somewhere... or am I doing something wrong?
>
> I think you need to avoid using vl_embed vectors because their implementation
> u
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus,
>> > it seems there is an error somewhere... or am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> I think you need to
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:22:01AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:12:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > When I remove the ": public zzzA" part the earnings disappear. Thus,
> >> > it seems there is an erro
Hi!
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:36:39 +0200, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 10:31 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:14:31 +0200, Svante Signell
> > wrote:
> > > Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian
> > > GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.7 (4.7.3-4)
Hi,
I don't remember seeing this testcase pass and the FAILs clutter the
testsresults. Can we XFAIL it?
Thanks,
Paolo.
Hi,
these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix
actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that?
Thanks,
Paolo.
On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a
fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that?
This is PR57548 and a patch is approved but unapplied:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00426.
On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a
fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for that?
This is PR57548 and a patch is approved but unapplied:
http:
On 2013-06-12 13:23 , Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi everyone, but especially Diego :-)
it seems to me that our new C++ vectors have some problems holding
derived classes. For example, when try to compile the following
The vec implementation in vec.[hc] must be a POD because we store
vectors in uni
Вы будете зреть мир во любых его расцветках http://goo.gl/1R0Y0?/MhffOh
Превосходно
Мама что-то говорила, плакала, щупала меня, Принц обнюхивал мою руку, за
которую брался оборотень, и рычал. Но все эти действия были от меня далеки,
развивались как бы на втором плане. Мои мысли, хлынувшие сокру
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled: is a fix
>>> actively in the making? Do we have any sort of tim
> On 06/13/2013 12:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >On 06/13/2013 12:28 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>these FAILs are much more recent but frankly I'm also puzzled:
> >>is a fix actively in the making? Do we have any sort of time for
> >>that?
> >This is PR57548 and a patch is approved bu
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:07:50AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 11:45 AM, Jens Taprogge wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote:
> >>On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 05:16:49PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >>>On 05/31/2013 04:42 PM, Jens Taprogge wrote:
> On F
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130613 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130613/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
15 matches
Mail list logo