Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
> > There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
> > targets.
>
> Why are you considering extending STABS at this point?
> STABS support might very well be dropped altogether from GCC 4.9
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:38 AM, David Taylor wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
>> > There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
>> > targets.
>>
>> Why are you considering extending STABS at this point?
>> ST
Hi All,
I applied gsoc for openMP taks scheduling and my advice may cover
taskyield facility. Currently i have some idea for taskyield. i think
i can add something. Therefore i wonder GCC mentor related about
openMP was announced? or should i wait until "student acceptance"?
Regards,
Güray Özen
P
On Tue, 14 May 2013 10:38:02 -0400, David Taylor wrote:
> There are other reasons besides the DWARF verboseness, but they are
> solvable. The verboseness (over 10x increase in the size of the elf
> file) is a show stopper.
People keep saying that here from time to time. You said it earlier
this y
guray.ozen wrote:
I applied gsoc for openMP taks scheduling and my advice may cover
taskyield facility. Currently i have some idea for taskyield. i think
i can add something. Therefore i wonder GCC mentor related about
openMP was announced? or should i wait until "student acceptance"?
You have
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 10:38:02 -0400, David Taylor wrote:
> > There are other reasons besides the DWARF verboseness, but they are
> > solvable. The verboseness (over 10x increase in the size of the elf
> > file) is a show stopper.
>
> People keep saying that here from tim
