On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:46:29PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 03/30/2013 02:23 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> >> I couldn't find a way to ask gcc to just generate DWARF (default
> >> version) either. How should this be fixed?
> >
> > Ma
On 04/02/2013 09:07 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Ok, how about the following (tentative) patch? If -gdwarf- is
specified without any argument, it picks DWARF 4 as the default.
-gdwarf- looks a bit odd to me; I was thinking -gdwarf without the
trailing -.
Jason
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 09:07 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> >Ok, how about the following (tentative) patch? If -gdwarf- is
> >specified without any argument, it picks DWARF 4 as the default.
>
> -gdwarf- looks a bit odd to me; I was thin
