Ian Lance Taylor google.com> writes:
>
> Why is that? decl_replaceable_p is supposed to be true for a function
> that may be replaced by an entirely different function at runtime.
> This is mainly to implement the correct semantics for weak functions.
> You can't inline a weak function, but at
I am Ali Al-Kilani a friend and personal account officer to a descendant and
former cabinet member of Libyan
Arab People's Socialist Republic.
I have an issue that need a little assistance should you be willing you can get
as much as half a million
dollar as compensation.
Regards
Ali
http://gcc.gnu.org still shows:
Development: GCC 4.8.0 (changes, release criteria)
Status: 2013-01-08
but there just was a status update:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-02/msg00177.html
Any word on 4.7.3 plans? If 4.8 is going RC in March, can 4.7.3 be far away?
thanks,
-Kenny
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Kenny Simpson wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org still shows:
> Development: GCC 4.8.0 (changes, release criteria)
> Status: 2013-01-08
>
> but there just was a status update:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-02/msg00177.html
I have a mail filter/script in place that notifies m
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20130216 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20130216/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 02/16/2013 01:30 AM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
Will gcc 4.8 contain the stdatomic.h header (i am a little confused
about it, is it a standard header?)?
It's part of the C11 standard, not C++11. C11 atomics will not be
supported in 4.8, but should be in 4.9.
Jason
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor google.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Why is that? decl_replaceable_p is supposed to be true for a function
>> that may be replaced by an entirely different function at runtime.
>> This is mainly to implement the correct semantics f
