Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2013-02-14)

2013-02-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, On 02/14/2013 11:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: Status == GCC trunk remains in release branch mode, with only regression fixes and documentation changes allowed. is there a chance to get this committed to GCC 4.8 even if its a P4 bug http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg005

GCC compiler for ANDROID Nexus7

2013-02-15 Thread Jerome Huck
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.n0n3m4.droidc&feature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS5uMG4zbTQuZHJvaWRjIl0.From Jerome Huck Good afternoon. There seems to be some versions of GCC for ANDROID C/C++/Pascal working or even Fortran, see the attached links. Can we hope one da

Re: libsanitizer and qemu compatibility

2013-02-15 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 14 February 2013 05:24, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > Are you talking about ARM Linux? Yes. > It will be easier for us (asan developers) to fix this upstream first. > Could you please file a bug at https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/ ? OK, just entered as #160 >

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2013-02-14)

2013-02-15 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > GCC trunk remains in release branch mode, with only regression fixes > > and documentation changes allowed. > > is there a chance to get this committed to GCC 4.8 even if its a P4 bug > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00544.html > >

Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2013-02-14)

2013-02-15 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> > GCC trunk remains in release branch mode, with only regression fixes >> > and documentation changes allowed. >> >> is there a chance to get this committed to GCC 4.8 even if its a P4 bug >

Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?

2013-02-15 Thread Jason Merrill
On 01/28/2013 02:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 01/23/2013 01:48 AM, Franz Fehringer wrote: What does this mean for the Concurrency section, it has 8xNo at the moment? I need to go back over that section, but I think it's just inaccurate. I've now updated the page. Jason

make_decl_one_only and inlining

2013-02-15 Thread Johannes Pfau
Hi, We recently got a bug report for the GCC D compiler frontend which shows that we currently don't inline any templated functions. The reason seems to be that decl_replaceable_p always returns true for D template functions. We currently just mark such template function instances using make_decl

Re: make_decl_one_only and inlining

2013-02-15 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > We recently got a bug report for the GCC D compiler frontend which shows that > we > currently don't inline any templated functions. The reason seems to be that > decl_replaceable_p always returns true for D template functions. Why is tha

gcc-4.6-20130215 is now available

2013-02-15 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20130215 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20130215/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?

2013-02-15 Thread Franz Fehringer
Thanks, looking much better now. Will gcc 4.8 contain the stdatomic.h header (i am a little confused about it, is it a standard header?)? Am 15.02.2013 18:07, schrieb Jason Merrill: > On 01/28/2013 02:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 01/23/2013 01:48 AM, Franz Fehringer wrote: >>> What does this

Re: gcc : c++11 : full support : eta?

2013-02-15 Thread niXman
2013/2/16 Franz Fehringer: > Thanks, looking much better now. > i am a little confused about it, is it a standard header? Hi, Yes: > If the macro constant __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__(C11) is defined by the compiler, > the header , the keyword _Atomic, and all of the names listed > here are not provided