the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should
the doc be "small vector or scalar"?
kenny
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should the
doc be "small vector or scalar"?
That might even be the majority of cases. Note that vec_concat is in
Hi All,
How can I set up a new project under GCC and make it open-sourced? Thanks!
Cheers,
Hongtao
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20130126 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20130126/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
This question is similar to my last; however, I think it provides a
bit more clarity as to how I am obtaining offsets from the frame
pointer. I have an RTL pass that is processed after expand passes. I
keep track of a list of stack allocated variables. For each VAR_DECL,
I obtain the DECL_RTL rt
> From: Kenneth Zadeck
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:19:40 +0100
> the definition of vec_duplicate in section 10.12 seems to restrictive.
>
> i have seen examples where the "small vector" is really a scalar. Should
> the doc be "small vector or scalar"?
Yes. This patch has been sitting in a tree
Richard Biener schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Hi, suppose the following C code:
static __inline__ __attribute__((__always_inline__))
_Fract rbits (const int i)
{
_Fract f;
