"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> Since I updated texinfo.tex, update_web_docs_svn has produced errors that
> don't make any sense to me.
Most likely due to this missing change:
2012-06-05 Karl Berry
* doc/texinfo.tex (\txiescapepdf): check \pdfescapestring
against \thisisundefin
I've recently encountered a gcc testsuite issue that is caused by the
libgcc_s in the built compiler being incompatible with, but the same
architecture as, the host's libc. I'm not sure what the right fix is,
so I'm looking for ideas.
I build gcc-4.7 for x86 on an x86 host. The bootstrap compile
On 06/22/2012 11:35 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
> Firstly, has anyone else encountered this or otherwise given it any
> thought? And secondly, any hints for practical fixes?
What you effectively seem to be building is a cross-compiler from
x86-glibc-A to x86-glibc-B. To run your tests, you want a m
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it has been quiet around Graphite for a while and I think it is more than
>> time to give an update on Graphite.
>>
>> == The Status of Graphite ==
>>
>> Graphite has been
On 06/22/2012 12:41 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
Hi,
it has been quiet around Graphite for a while and I think it is more than
time to give an update on Graphite.
== The Status of G
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 12:41 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
Hi,
it has been quiet around Graphite for
On 06/22/2012 01:19 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 06/22/2012 12:41 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Tobias Grosserwrote:
Hi,
it has been qui
Hi gentlemen.
I am looking again at LTO + TM. The goal is to be able to link with the
implemented _ITM_* functions in libitm.a, and have them inlined into the
transaction code when profitable.
To refresh everyone's memory, the original problem was two-fold:
a) If a user provides a builtin i
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> There are two areas that do not yet have an isl counterpart. The
> openscop import/export and the loop interchange heuristic. I think you
> can safely crop the openscop import/export, as it is currently unused
> and can later be added back if ne
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi gentlemen.
>
> I am looking again at LTO + TM. The goal is to be able to link with the
> implemented _ITM_* functions in libitm.a, and have them inlined into the
> transaction code when profitable.
>
> To refresh everyone's memory, the o
On 06/22/2012 03:02 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Tobias Grosser wrote:
There are two areas that do not yet have an isl counterpart. The
openscop import/export and the loop interchange heuristic. I think you
can safely crop the openscop import/export, as it is currently unus
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi gentlemen.
> >
> > I am looking again at LTO + TM. The goal is to be able to link with the
> > implemented _ITM_* functions in libitm.a, and have them inlined into the
> > transaction code when profitable.
> >
> > To refresh everyone
Andrew Haley writes:
> On 06/22/2012 11:35 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
>> Firstly, has anyone else encountered this or otherwise given it any
>> thought? And secondly, any hints for practical fixes?
>
> What you effectively seem to be building is a cross-compiler from
> x86-glibc-A to x86-glibc-B.
On 06/22/2012 03:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andrew Haley writes:
>
>> On 06/22/2012 11:35 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
>>> Firstly, has anyone else encountered this or otherwise given it any
>>> thought? And secondly, any hints for practical fixes?
>>
>> What you effectively seem to be buildin
Andrew Haley writes:
> On 06/22/2012 03:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Andrew Haley writes:
>>
>>> On 06/22/2012 11:35 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
Firstly, has anyone else encountered this or otherwise given it any
thought? And secondly, any hints for practical fixes?
>>>
>>> What yo
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120622 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120622/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
16 matches
Mail list logo
