Hi, I'm getting the following error in viewvc for several days now:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/dse.c?view=markup
An Exception Has Occurred
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/viewvc/lib/viewvc.py", line
4463, in main
reque
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 10:37:03 +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
Hi,
For the following simple test case, PRE optimization hoists
computation
(s!=1) into the default branch of the switch statement, and finally
causes
very poor code generation. This problem occurs in both X86 and ARM,
and I
believe it
Hi,
Current implementation of ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized is
#define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
(ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx),\
sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT) - 1), \
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, 王亮 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current implementation of ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized is
>
> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
> (ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx), \
> sizeo
Hi again! Can you please reply - do you ever need this mirror?
Thank you.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Sergey Kutserey wrote:
> Hi there! We just raised a new mirror in US, Missouri, Saint Louis.
> It has 100Mb/s connection and synced twice a day from main site gcc.gnu.org
> URL of mirror is:
The g++.dg/init/copy7.C testcase checks whether the C++ frontend
guards memcpy it emits via a conditional verifying that src != dst
because calling memcpy with overlapping source / destination is
not supported.
The testcase is misguided though (and the C++ frontend was, until
recently) - the midd
Paul Edwards wrote:
> I was surprised that an instruction that is marked as s_operand
> was getting a seemingly non-s_operand given to it, so I added an
> "S" constraint:
That's right. It is not good to have a constraint that accepts
more than the predicate, since reload will at this point only
You'll need to mark your new constraint as EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT
so that reload knows what to do when an argument doesn't match.
Thanks! That certainly produced an effect.
Unfortunately it's not quite right, seemingly not loading R9 properly:
LR9,13
AR9,13
MVC 0(10,9),0(2)
And it
On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The argument still holds that no reasonable memcpy implementation
> will reject the src == dest case.
Hum... Sounds like if that's the case that we should document it in the manual
as something we expect (requirement) of the memcpy implement
王亮 writes:
> Hi,
>
> Current implementation of ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized is
>
> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
> (ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx),\
>sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT
Paul Edwards wrote:
> Unfortunately it's not quite right, seemingly not loading R9 properly:
>
> LR9,13
> AR9,13
> MVC 0(10,9),0(2)
That's weird. What does the reload dump (.greg) say?
> And it had a knock-on effect too, producing bad code elsewhere:
>
> < SLR 2,2
> <
Hello Everyone,
This letter describes the recently created GCC branch called "cilkplus" that
ports the Intel(R) Cilk(TM) Plus language extensions to the C and C++
front-ends of gcc-4.7. We are looking for collaborators and advice as we
proceed - both on this open-source gcc project, and on th
Hi,
I checked this into cilkplus branch. Jason, can you also mirror
branches/cilkplus in GCC git mirror?
Thanks.
H.J.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> This letter describes the recently created GCC branch called "cilkplus"
> that ports the Inte
>AFAIK SMS will not do speculative memory access.
Right, SMS does no speculative memory access. Though that might not be
a bad idea...
Ayal.
2011/8/11 Revital Eres
>
> Hello,
>
> >> I appriciate explanation regarding the following piece of code in
> >> sched_analyze_insn function (sched-deps.c)
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, 王亮 wrote:
>> The size it allocates is
>>
>> (sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT) - 1)) * sizeof (rtx)
>> Originally, the allocated size is
>>
>> sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT) - 1) * sizeof (rtx)
Yes, this is correct, good catch.
>> (sizeof (struct rtv
2011/8/15 Andreas Schwab :
> I think it was meant to be this:
>
> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \
> ggc_alloc_zone_rtvec_def (sizeof (struct rtvec_def) \
> + ((NELT) - 1) * sizeof (rtx), \
>
16 matches
Mail list logo