Hi!
Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask it:
How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
Have a look at the latest press news of PathScale:
http://www.pathscale.com/taxonomy/term/27
Have additional a look at this articls of phronix:
http://www.phoronix.co
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unroll_1.c?view=markup&pathrev=174762
Since several days now I observe Python exceptions in viewcvs ike that:
An Exception Has Occurred
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/viewvc/lib/v
Dear Qiong Cai,
Some time ago I offered you the possibility of making your academic paper
entitled «Profile-guided redundancy elimination» available as printed book.
Since I did not hear back from you, I am now wondering if you received my
first email. I would appreciate if you could confirm your
> You can use different benchmarks. For me it seems, that with EKOPath compiled
> programs are a lot faster then with GCC.
Hmm.. have tested it again.
It seems, that this is only true without GCC-optimization.
With the option -O I no longer see any difference between the performance of
GCC and
On 06/18/2011 11:24 AM, theUser BL wrote:
Hi!
Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask it:
How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
Perhaps in this way ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00141.html
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of commit history.
Additional information is he
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of comm
On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we start
2011/6/18 Toon Moene :
> On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
>> On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>>> On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>
>>>
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're in the process of considering contribut
2011/6/18 theUser BL :
>
> Hi!
>
> Currently I have nothing about it found in the mailinglist. So I try to ask
> it: How effect the OpenSource EKOPath the GCC ?
>
> Have a look at the latest press news of PathScale:
> http://www.pathscale.com/taxonomy/term/27
>
> Have additional a look at this art
On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Hi
We're in the process of considering contributing to gfortran for a
special project, but when we started to vet the codebase we hit a bump
in lack of comm
Hello All,
For those interested, I uploaded this morning 130 slides on a tutorial
I gave last week on GCC plugins & MELT extensions at Archi11 summer school.
(slides are CC by SA)
See http://gcc-melt.org/ where you can download the PDF file
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://staryn
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:22:21PM +0700, Christopher Bergstr?m wrote:
> 2011/6/18 Toon Moene :
> > On 06/18/2011 01:02 PM, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
> >> On 06/18/11 05:16 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> >>> On 06/18/2011 12:12 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 05:05 AM, Christopher Bergstr?m wrote:
Hi Liu
> Chris is your boss?
No. Who is Chris?
> I know that EKOPath is much more better than open64,
And could code of it useful for GCC or not?
> but open64 can compile nothing but spec2000.
Open64? I have googled at it. Do you mean that at
http://www.open64.net/
I talked
Hello All
(I tried to send a PDF attached to a mail here but it don't work)
For information, I attached under http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Memory_management
the slides I showed today in Victoria room about gengtype & C++
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email
On 06/18/11 11:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Good luck with that endeavor. After the gfortran fork,
a certain individual would routinely obfusicate the code
in one of the repositories via gratuitious code motion,
varaible renaming, and whitespace munging. This was an
attempt to neutered diff. Thi
2011/6/19 theUser BL :
>
> Hi Liu
>
>
>> Chris is your boss?
>
>
>
> No. Who is Chris?
>
>
>
>
>> I know that EKOPath is much more better than open64,
>
>
>
> And could code of it useful for GCC or not?
>
>
>
>
>
>> but open64 can compile nothing but spec2000.
>
>
>
> Open64? I have googled at it.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:13:25AM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
> On 06/18/11 11:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >Good luck with that endeavor. After the gfortran fork,
> >a certain individual would routinely obfusicate the code
> >in one of the repositories via gratuitious code motion,
> >varaible r
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20110618 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20110618/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
19 matches
Mail list logo
