On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:27:15AM +0900, Sho Nakatani wrote:
> In my opinion, even tied task needs user-level thread for scheduling.
I don't think so. Of course you need some data structure for each task, but
having to allocate (even if from cache) a separate stack for each task is a
significant
On 27/04/11 18:29, Deryck Hodge wrote:
I work at Canonical on Launchpad and am trying to setup syncing
between our bug tracker and the GCC bug tracker. Specifically, we
want to enable comment syncing between linked bugs on our trackers and
back links from your Bugzilla to the Launchpad bug. Cur
On 3 May 2011 10:51, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 27/04/11 18:29, Deryck Hodge wrote:
>>
>> I work at Canonical on Launchpad and am trying to setup syncing
>> between our bug tracker and the GCC bug tracker. Specifically, we
>> want to enable comment syncing between linked bugs on our trackers and
>>
Hi, all.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 May 2011 10:51, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> On 27/04/11 18:29, Deryck Hodge wrote:
>>>
>>> I work at Canonical on Launchpad and am trying to setup syncing
>>> between our bug tracker and the GCC bug tracker. Specifically, we
>>>
Deryck Hodge writes:
> I believe this will work in the way the covers everyones concerns.
> Please let me know if there are other concerns. If not, I would like
> to go ahead and set this up.
Please go ahead. Thanks.
Ian
Hi Ismail!
My study mainly focuses on integration of transactional memory support
into data-flow extension of OpenMP that is
aiming increased expressiveness and performance while preserving the
paradigms' properties.
I am really happy to see people working with transactional memory. I
will tr
This merge brings google/gcc-4_6 up to date with google/main rev
173286, minus rev 173258 (we found an issue with that revision that
Chris is going to address). It also merged from gcc-4_6-branch rev
173305.
Validated on x86_64. Attached are the list of changes brought in from
google/main and gc
Is it possible to add an argument to the test in the
execution phase of the testsuite? I am looking into
some test cases where number of threads to run must
be provided on the invocation line of the test if not
specified during the test compilation. Something that
is similar to "dg-skip-if" syntax
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:09 +0200, ismail kuru wrote:
>
>
> On 3 May 2011 17:02, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> Hi Ismail!
>
>
> My study mainly focuses on integration of
> transactional memory support
> into data-flow extension
Nenad Vukicevic writes:
> Is it possible to add an argument to the test in the
> execution phase of the testsuite? I am looking into
> some test cases where number of threads to run must
> be provided on the invocation line of the test if not
> specified during the test compilation. Something tha
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110503 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110503/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
I am writing a gcc plugin and am trying to detect if a value assigned by a
function call, is a global variable or not. Unfortunately, all calls to
'is_global_var' with a DECL type are returning false.
My pass executes after alias analysis, and ipa analysis. The
cfun->gimple_df->ipa_pta is set to
Hi,
My image was built with arm-none-eabi-xxx tool chain(2008-q3). And the compile
options as follow.
FCFLAG = -msoft-float -mfloat-abi=soft -mno-apcs-float
FAFLAG = -msoft-float -mfloat-abi=soft
CFLAG = -mcpu=cortex-a8 $(FCFLAG) -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Winline -Wundef -mapcs
13 matches
Mail list logo
