I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3
for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I
remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3.
Thanks!
On 02/14/2011 05:06 PM, nayanalekha sugandanee wrote:
> I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3
> for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I
> remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3.
>
I would recommend asking the closest computer science muse
On 11/02/11 19:41, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
My case was somewhat different. I think I just patched gcse_constant_p.
Thanks!
On 14 February 2011 16:08, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 05:06 PM, nayanalekha sugandanee wrote:
>> I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3
>> for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I
>> remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3.
>>
> I wou
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components
> > that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux
> > kernel support u
nayanalekha sugandanee writes:
> I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3
> for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I
> remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3.
This question is not appropriate for the mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
which is for
Hi us,
When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3 from the URL of China
it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
You can click China's for a try. Could anyone do for it. Or i want
to take the mirror on my website server(www.harrywei.org). I don't kno
On 02/14/2011 05:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
nayanalekha sugandanee writes:
I have already install gcc 4.3 version.I need to install gcc 2.95.3
for a research on Polis IDE and Ptolami.Please let me know how can I
remove gcc 4.3 and install gcc 2.95.3.
This question is not appropriate for
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 05:27:37PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13 February 2011 09:01, Csaba Raduly wrote:
Any idea what could be the problem and how to fix it? Should I just
run a simple "make"?
Questions about using or building gcc should be sent to
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, not this lis
Background:
Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer
values are always sign extended.
Because there are not already enough MIPS ABIs
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote:
> Background:
>
> Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
> user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
> segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer
> values are always
2011/2/15 Harry Wei :
> Hi us,
> When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3 from the URL of
> China it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
> You can click China's for a try. Could anyone do for it. Or i want
> to take the mirror on my website server(
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote:
>
>> Background:
>>
>> Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
>> user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
>> segmented. Only the ran
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB
> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers.
>
> This seems like a microscopically small market segment. I can't see any
> s
On Feb 14, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
>> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB
>> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers.
>>
>> This seems like a micros
On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote:
Background:
Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is avai
On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB but
less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want 64 bit pointers.
This seems like a microscopically small ma
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see
>> is that this new ABI requires a 64bit kernel since faults through the
>> upper 2G will go through the XTLB miss exception ve
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:26 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB
>>> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want
On 02/14/2011 06:34 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:26 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB but
less than 4 GB, and
On 02/14/2011 06:33 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see
is that this new ABI requires a 64bit kernel since faults through the
upper 2G will go t
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:50 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:33 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see
is that this
Hi all,
Does GCC has any command line switches which generate variant code?
Regards,
Sankar
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolb
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 08:51:22AM +0800, Mingjie Xing wrote:
> 2011/2/15 Harry Wei :
> > Hi us,
> >When i want to download the mirror of Gcc 4.3 from the URL
> > of China it shows broken. The URL is: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
> >You can click China's for a t
sankar chebolu writes:
> Does GCC has any command line switches which generate variant code?
This question as stated is not appropriate for the mailing list
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is for the development of gcc. It would be
appropriate for gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org. Please take any followups to
gcc-
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
* Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096).
I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the
responsibility to get it working.
26 matches
Mail list logo
