2011/1/24 Ian Lance Taylor :
> Daniel Marjamäki writes:
>
>> 2011/1/24 Ian Lance Taylor :
>>
>>> The problem with warnings for this kind of code in C/C++ is that it
>>> often arises in macro expansions.
>>
>> I see... so it won't be included in gcc. :-(
>
> Actually, I think it could be included i
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 16:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Marjamäki writes:
>
>> Do you have any opinion about adding a warning for:
>>
>> int f(char c)
>> {
>> return 10 * (c == 13) ? 1 : 2;
>> }
>> As far as I see the multiplication doesn't exist in the gimple format
>> (looking at a
$ ./config.guess
i686-pc-linux-gnu
$ cat /etc/issue
Welcome to SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (i586) - Kernel \r (\l).
$ cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (i586)
VERSION = 9
$ uname -sr
Linux 2.6.5-7.139-default
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.3-98.38
$ /opt/gcc4.1.2/bin/gcc -v
U
Kevin André writes:
> Is that ever going to be fixed? If a front end mangles its AST
> representation, then it cannot be used for static analysis.
>
> Even if the constant folding in the front end is necessary for
> checking semantics, you could still keep the original source in the
> AST and sim
I've just merged trunk into google/integration. Since this was
the first merge, I created:
- gcc/ChangeLog.google for all branch ChangeLogs.
- Added google/integration and google/main to svn.html.
- Modified DATESTAMP and BASE-VER to reference the last merge
point. --version should show:
$
Could someone tell me if the work described in this paper
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/GCC/Reprints-2006/namolaru-reprint.pdf was
completed and is part of gcc?Thanks
I'm trying compile a version of gcc-4.5 on linux x86 for linux x86 which
is relocatable but I'm having difficulty.
Does anyone have an example of how to build such a relocatable gcc?
I've been building binutils, and gcc-4.5 over and over
with many different options. After reading the docs I
On 25 January 2011 22:19, Kyle Girard wrote:
>
> I'm trying compile a version of gcc-4.5 on linux x86 for linux x86 which
> is relocatable but I'm having difficulty.
>
> Does anyone have an example of how to build such a relocatable gcc?
>
> I've been building binutils, and gcc-4.5 over and over
>
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20110125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20110125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Black Bit writes:
> Could someone tell me if the work described in this paper
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/GCC/Reprints-2006/namolaru-reprint.pdf was
> completed and is part of gcc?Thanks
To the best of my knowledge the work has not yet beco
10 matches
Mail list logo