Is the gcc garbage collector compacting?
In particular I want to have ".def" file (like tree.def) where
the macros generate struct declarations,
and the fields might be tree.
That won't work with the gcc garbage collection scheme.
However, I'm willing also store all trees
that go in these st
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:00:42 +
Jay K wrote:
> Is the gcc garbage collector compacting?
No. Ggc (the GCC garbage collector) is mark & sweep, but *precise*. In
fact, it is only run explicitly, usually between passes (but never from
the allocation routines). And it does not know about any lo
> Are you coding inside your branch, or just your plugin?
> [implied] What are you actually doing?
It isn't relevant or short, but if you really want to know:
It is a front end, and indeed, a branch, it won't ever be contributed.
It is the Modula-3 frontend, which plays slight licensing gam
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:19:06 +
Jay K wrote:
>
> > Are you coding inside your branch, or just your plugin?
> > [implied] What are you actually doing?
>
>
> It isn't relevant or short, but if you really want to know:
>
>
> It is a front end, and indeed, a branch, it won't ever be contrib
> I believe that your case is a very good example of why front-ends
> should be able to become plugins. It is not the case yet, and adding
Currently we do define a new tree code, I think just one.
And the implementation is *slightly* invasive.
I was tempted to write up a proposal to this list
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Steve Ellcey writes:
>
>> I tried creating a proc 'check_effective_target_mempcpy'
>> in gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp and using
>>
>> /* { dg-require-effective-target mempcpy } */
>>
>> on the test, but that did not work. It appears
We are hereby now officially in Stage 3 (general bugfixes only, no
new features). We have accumulated 7 months worth of stage 1 development.
Now it's a good time to concentrate on fixing the regressions we
introduced and to flesh out fine details of new features.
Happy bugfixing,
Richard.
3 lo Ao Da