C99 and C++0x status pages

Yesterday, I spent an hour looking for the C99 and C++0x status pages in http://gcc.gnu.org/, http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html Apparently, the shortest path to the latter is "Releases" -> "GCC 4.5.1" -> "GCC 4.5.1 Jul 31, 2010 (changes)"

Re: Add uninitialized attribute?

On 08/30/2010 03:50 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2010-08-30 14:46:57 +0200, Michael Matz wrote: >> int x = x; >> >> is the way GCC offers this idiom since about forever, no need for an >> attribute. Downthread I see that people worry about this generating an >> actual (uninitialized) access t

Re: C99 and C++0x status pages

Andre Majorel wrote: > Those are among the most useful pages of the site, it makes no > sense to bury them 4+ levels deep. Google is your friend: when asked for g++ c++0x it returns the correct page as the first result. I always use it that way, because website messiness appears to be a de facto

RE: Clustering switch cases

> I will be looking at the patch Rahul posted and will try to see if I > can improve on it. See attached patch (again) that Paulo is referring to. Sending to GCC failed due to email client issues. I have another patch for http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00413.html Which I will send out short

Re: Add uninitialized attribute?

On 8/31/2010 1:19 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 08/30/2010 03:50 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2010-08-30 14:46:57 +0200, Michael Matz wrote: >>> int x = x; >>> >>> is the way GCC offers this idiom since about forever, no need for an >>> attribute. Downthread I see that people worry about this

End of GCC 4.6 Stage 1: October 27, 2010

We (GCC RMs) plan to close GCC 4.6 Stage 1 on or or about October 27, 2010 (the closing day of the GCC Summit). Major features should be checked in prior to this point. Please let us know if you have a major feature that you think you will not be able to get checked in prior to October 27th. Tha

Re: How is the definition of stack canary on MIPS arch?

On 08/30/2010 08:36 PM, Adam Jiang wrote: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43:44AM -0700, David Daney wrote: On 08/30/2010 09:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: On 08/30/2010 03:45 AM, Adam Jiang wrote: When I read the source in Linux kerne, it was said that stack canary for implementing stack protecto

gcc-4.4-20100831 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100831 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100831/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Clustering switch cases

> > In fact we might want to move switch optimization up to the tree level > > (just because it's way easier to deal with there). Thus, lower switch > > to a mixture of binary tree & jump-tables (possibly using perfect > > hashing). > > Doing the optimisation at the tree-level was exactly my init

Atom 2010-Q3 SPEC CPU 2K results

H.J. gcc 4.6 Atom 2010-Q3.xlsx Description: gcc 4.6 Atom 2010-Q3.xlsx

Recall: Atom 2010-Q3 SPEC CPU 2K results

Lu, Hongjiu would like to recall the message, "Atom 2010-Q3 SPEC CPU 2K results".