Re: For testing: full __float128 patch

2010-08-29 Thread FX
GCC >= 4.5 is needed. I'll add a check to libquad's configure. FX Le 29 août 2010 à 02:56, Steve Kargl a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:47:28PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:24:47AM +0200, FX wrote: >>> Before I submit it officially for review, I want this patch

Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-29 Thread Uday P. Khedker
I am not sure that is easily feasible. I would believe it is impossible. Within the compiler (or inside a GCC plugin, or inside a GCC extension coded in MELT), you probably are able change/inspect C++ classes& every other declaration any compiler is tracking. You are also able to find every oc

Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-29 Thread J Decker
Just out of curiosity - isn't this what C# does with objects? would it perhaps be something like that in how mcs (mono) builds objects and tracks their lifespan? On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Uday P. Khedker wrote: > >> I am not sure that is easily feasible. I would believe it is impossible.

Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-29 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 17:13 +0530, Uday P. Khedker wrote: > > I am not sure that is easily feasible. I would believe it is impossible. > > > > Within the compiler (or inside a GCC plugin, or inside a GCC extension > > coded in MELT), you probably are able change/inspect C++ classes& every > > othe

Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-29 Thread Uday P. Khedker
Unfortunately I am not aware of C# implementation so can't respond to this... Uday. J Decker wrote, On Sunday 29 August 2010 05:32 PM: Just out of curiosity - isn't this what C# does with objects? would it perhaps be something like that in how mcs (mono) builds objects and tracks their lifespa

Re: For testing: full __float128 patch

2010-08-29 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +0200, FX wrote: > GCC >= 4.5 is needed. I'll add a check to libquad's configure. > > FX > Further testing on i386-*-freebsd runs into undefined symbols. libquad.so: undefined reference to `__getf2' libquad.so: undefined reference to `__eqtf2' libquad.so: unde

gcc-4.3-20100829 is now available

2010-08-29 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20100829 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20100829/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: For testing: full __float128 patch

2010-08-29 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +0200, FX wrote: > > GCC >= 4.5 is needed. I'll add a check to libquad's configure. > > > > FX > > > > Further testing on i386-*-freebsd runs into undefined symbols. > > libquad.so: undefined reference to `__getf2' > libquad.so: undefined reference t

Re: For testing: full __float128 patch

2010-08-29 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:48:46PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +0200, FX wrote: > > > GCC >= 4.5 is needed. I'll add a check to libquad's configure. > > > > > > FX > > > > > > > Further testing on i386-*-freebsd runs into undefined symbols. > > >

Re: 2010 GCC and GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit

2010-08-29 Thread NightStrike
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > Andrew J. Hutton wrote: > >> The annual GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers’ Summit brings together the core >> development team of the GNU Compiler Collection with those working on the >> other toolchain components to discuss the state of the art. W

gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check

2010-08-29 Thread Tom Browder
I posted this earlier on gcc-help but no solutions that worked. After a good build of gcc-4.5.1 I did 'make check' (several times now). I only get one failure for languages c,c++,fortran. Portion of test results showing failure: Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp a

Re: For testing: full __float128 patch

2010-08-29 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: >> > Further testing on i386-*-freebsd runs into undefined symbols. >> > >> > libquad.so: undefined reference to `__getf2' >> > libquad.so: undefined reference to `__eqtf2' >> > libquad.so: undefined reference to `__addtf3' >> > libquad.so: unde

Re: gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check

2010-08-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 30 August 2010 02:59, Tom Browder wrote: > I posted this earlier on gcc-help but no solutions that worked. > > After a good build of gcc-4.5.1 I did 'make check' (several times > now).  I only get one failure for languages c,c++,fortran. > > Portion of test results showing failure: > > Running t