On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> [I proposed removing RIOS support, since it heavily gets in the way
> for my project exposing the XER[CA] flag].
>
>> My argument is simply this, sorry if it wasn't clear in the last
>> email, bottom line up front:
>> - It can just as eas
Do I understand correctly that the current GCC implementation of
std::string is non-conforming, because it does ref-counting + copy-on-write?
If so, is there some compiler flag to switch to a conforming
(non-ref-counting) std::string implementation?
If I understand well, the Versatile String,
On 07/04/2010 04:19 PM, nielsdek...@xs4all.nl wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that the current GCC implementation of
> std::string is non-conforming, because it does ref-counting +
> copy-on-write?
If you mean by non-conforming "non-conforming to the not existing yet
new C++ standard, so far kno
[Oops, I shot myself in the foot by using a mail address that I'd rather
keep spam free, in my previous message! I'm surprised the message was
forwarded straight to the mailing list, because it wasn't the address I
used when I subscribed.]
Do I understand correctly that the current GCC implem
On 07/04/2010 10:02 PM, Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 wrote:
> Thanks, that's what I meant indeed. (In fact I got the word
> "conforming" from gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html which says that
> __versa_string provides "facilities conforming to the standard
> requirements for basic_string"
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:48 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > ; Current assemblers are broken and do not allow @GOTOFF in
> > ; ought but a memory context.
> >
> > Code, following this comment disables or special-cases
> > "pic_symbolic_operands".
> >
> > I'm investiga
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20100704 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20100704/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
