Jan Hubicka wrote:
GiNaC indeed shows interesting behaviour. Just the first test on 4.3 is:
timing commutative expansion and substitution
size: 100 200 400 800
time/s: 0.064 0.301.4 6.2
for 4.5
timing commutative expansion and substitution
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 01:37 +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 6/27/10, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 May 2010, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > > I think that's a critical distinction. I can't see removing a port just
> > > because it's not used much (or at all) because it might be valuable for
>
Hi,
In the Obj{C,C++} testsuite we have cases where we want to check for
reasonably long ascii strings in generated data.
At present, this is done in some places by dg-final/scan-assembler
constructs, but these can (and do) fail when the target assembler
breaks long strings into shorter c
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> Ian had confidence in me. He also liked the proposal I set for how to
> go about it.
So who actually said no?
David
The trunk is frozen for all changes starting this Wednesday, 20:00 UTC
in preparation for merging the mem-ref2 branch. The freeze is expected
to last until early Friday morning. An explicit un-freeze mail will
be sent as a reply to this mail.
Thanks.
Richard.
> The trunk is frozen for all changes starting this Wednesday, 20:00 UTC
Web will be the 30th, not the 28th, can you confirm the date?
Arno
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > The trunk is frozen for all changes starting this Wednesday, 20:00 UTC
>
> Web will be the 30th, not the 28th, can you confirm the date?
Whoops sorry - 30th indeed. This is what you get for picking the
date off your clock instead of looking at a ca
Hello all,
I would like to know why does gimple_body returns NULL pointer when I try to
use it after the "cfg" pass ? Does someone have informations about the general
use of it ?
Because I am trying to traverse instructions from a C program thanks to MELT
(cf MELT branch) and I don't know if
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:38, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to know why does gimple_body returns NULL pointer when I try to
> use it after the "cfg" pass ? Does someone have informations about the
> general use of it ?
Because the body has been split up into the basic blocks of the CFG
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> Ian had confidence in me. He also liked the proposal I set for how to
>> go about it.
>
> So who actually said no?
>
> David
>
The Frederic guy didn't like my fake-looking fake nam
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> Ian had confidence in me. He also liked the proposal I set for how to
>> go about it.
>
> So who actually said no?
>
> David
>
The Frederic guy didn't like my fake-looking fake nam
On 06/28/2010 04:11 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> You guys need to realize how online identities work in this century.
>
>From "The Hound of the Baskervilles", Arthur Conan Doyle, 1902:
"Out of the envelope he took a half-sheet of foolscap paper folded
into four. This he opened and spread flat u
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:59:39PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> The trunk is frozen for all changes starting this Wednesday, 20:00 UTC
> in preparation for merging the mem-ref2 branch. The freeze is expected
> to last until early Friday morning. An explicit un-freeze mail will
> be sent as
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> The Frederic guy didn't like my fake-looking fake name, and wanted a
> real-looking-but-just-as-fake name, or he wouldn't create a sourceware
> account for me. He then ignored my followup emails asking for
> clarification.
Other people can
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:13 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>
>> The Frederic guy didn't like my fake-looking fake name, and wanted a
>> real-looking-but-just-as-fake name, or he wouldn't create a sourceware
>> account for me. He then ignored my
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a support for vector shuffling. For this
purpose I would like to introduce a built-in function and lower it
down in the veclower pass. However the problem is, that I don't want
to introduce a separate built-in function for each type. So the
question is: how can I specif
The GCC build process uses ecj, which is obtained from sourceware.org
using contrib/download_ecj. The current latest version of ecj, used
for the GCC build, is ecj 4.5.
The previous version of ecj was 4.3, the source for which can be found
at the same location on sourceware.org. But the FTP site d
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:08 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
>
> You guys need to realize how online identities work in this century.
Everyone realize that.
But you (whoever you really are) should also realize that to submit
patches and have them accepted, you need to have some legal papers done
with t
> While I do understand the reasons people want to hide with a pseudonym
> on many forums (or social sites), I don't understand why someone want to
> hide his identity when contributing to GCC (and therefore, after having
> done the legal work of getting the legal papers signed...).
I don't either
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:08 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>> You guys need to realize how online identities work in this century.
>
> Everyone realize that.
>
> But you (whoever you really are) should also realize that to submit
> patch
(Off topic)
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> But you (whoever you really are) should also realize that to submit
> patches and have them accepted, you need to have some legal papers done
> with the FSF (copyright transfer or disclaimer, see the "legal
> prerequisites" section of http://gcc.gnu.org/co
On 06/28/2010 01:11 PM, Brett Neumeier wrote:
The GCC build process uses ecj, which is obtained from sourceware.org
using contrib/download_ecj. The current latest version of ecj, used
for the GCC build, is ecj 4.5.
The previous version of ecj was 4.3, the source for which can be found
at the sam
Hello All,
(With Jeremie Salvucci we are trying to improve a bit gengtype, in
particular w.r.t. plugins & perhaps C++; we will continue to improve
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02178.html soon, taking
into account Paolo's remarks)
I am not a C++ expert, so I am asking: what would b
On 28 June 2010 23:25, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Can we - if possible - concentrate again at improving GCC and its
> infrastructure rather than doing this phantom debate? In case of
> Nightstrike, we have an active tester and thus contributor to especially
> MinGW64, who is also willing to work on
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 23:35 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 28 June 2010 23:25, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> >
> > Can we - if possible - concentrate again at improving GCC and its
> > infrastructure rather than doing this phantom debate? In case of
> > Nightstrike, we have an active tester and t
> "If a contributor wants the FSF to publish only a pseudonym, that is ok.
> The contributor should say this, and state the desired pseudonym, when
> answering the request- form. The actual legal papers will use the real
> name, but the FSF will publish only the pseudonym."
I was unaware of that.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Bah! Someone already volunteered to do it in several occasions.
> Myself, a long time ago. Someone else a few months ago, Frederic
> Buclin volunteered to help and Nightstrike in that very same PR. The
> answer was silence. It is not a matter of vol
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> But you (whoever you really are) should also realize that to submit
> patches and have them accepted, you need to have some legal papers done
Bugzilla is not FSF-copyright code, and I see no reason we should require
assignments for people workin
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I will do my best to support whoever wants
> to help with getting Bugzilla updated.
Gerald,
NightStrike has volunteered to help upgrade Bugzilla.
How do we move forward?
- David
On 28.06.2010 23:25, David Daney wrote:
On 06/28/2010 01:11 PM, Brett Neumeier wrote:
The GCC build process uses ecj, which is obtained from sourceware.org
using contrib/download_ecj. The current latest version of ecj, used
for the GCC build, is ecj 4.5.
The previous version of ecj was 4.3, the
Hello all,
What is the role of executable_checksum from c-common.h & generated by
genchecksum.
In particular, in the MELT runtime plugin (actually in the MELT branch)
I was supposing it was always defined. However, when referencing it from
melt-runtime.c I got an undefined symbol when linking the
> Hello all,
>
> What is the role of executable_checksum from c-common.h & generated by
> genchecksum.
>
> In particular, in the MELT runtime plugin (actually in the MELT branch)
> I was supposing it was always defined. However, when referencing it from
> melt-runtime.c I got an undefined symbol
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> * I don't know exactly what should be wished with respect to templates.
> Tom Tromey (in CC) have a wonderful insight in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00143.html but I probably did not
> understood all the details & the consequences. In particular I don't
>
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > * I don't know exactly what should be wished with respect to templates.
> > Tom Tromey (in CC) have a wonderful insight in
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00143.html but I probably did not
> >
NightStrike writes:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>>> Ian had confidence in me. He also liked the proposal I set for how to
>>> go about it.
>>
>> So who actually said no?
>>
>> David
>>
>
> The Frederic guy
On 29 June 2010 00:19, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>>
>> > * I don't know exactly what should be wished with respect to templates.
>> > Tom Tromey (in CC) have a wonderful insight in
>> > http://gcc.gnu.or
IainS writes:
> In the Obj{C,C++} testsuite we have cases where we want to check for
> reasonably long ascii strings in generated data.
>
> At present, this is done in some places by dg-final/scan-assembler
> constructs, but these can (and do) fail when the target assembler
> breaks long strings
Artem Shinkarov writes:
> I'm trying to implement a support for vector shuffling. For this
> purpose I would like to introduce a built-in function and lower it
> down in the veclower pass. However the problem is, that I don't want
> to introduce a separate built-in function for each type. So the
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> What is the role of executable_checksum from c-common.h & generated by
> genchecksum.
It is used for precompiled headers. It verifies that the precompiled
header was generated by precisely the same compiler as the one trying to
use the precompiled header. This ap
> > In Tom's interesting idea, we would write the mark function by hand
> for
> > each C++ type that we use GTY with.
> >
> > One way to make this approach work for plugins would be to write
> >
> > template
> > void
> > mark(T& t)
> > {
> > t->mark();
> > }
> >
> > Then every plugin which invent
Ian> In Tom's interesting idea, we would write the mark function by hand for
Ian> each C++ type that we use GTY with.
I think we should be clear that the need to write a mark function for a
new type is a drawback of this approach. Perhaps gengtype could still
write the functions for ordinary type
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> NightStrike writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:10 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
Ian had confidence in me. He also liked the proposal I set for how to
go about it.
>
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:58 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > What is the role of executable_checksum from c-common.h & generated by
> > genchecksum.
>
> It is used for precompiled headers. It verifies that the precompiled
> header was generated by precisely th
In the GCC 4.5 announcement:
"Support for the classic POWER architecture implemented in the
original RIOS and RIOS2 processors of the old IBM RS/6000 product line
has been obsoleted in the rs6000 port. This does not affect the new
generation Power and PowerPC architectures."
What needs to be done
NightStrike writes:
> It would have been courteous for you -- or Frederic, or anyone else --
> to have communicated that to me instead of just ignoring me.
Yes. I was not part of the conversation stream. I apologize on behalf
of Frank (not Frederic). He should have replied.
>> Giving somebo
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> However, I see a slightly more general use of executable_checksum (or
> something similar) in plugins. Imagine a plugin that store some
> information somewhere (e.g. in a database) and which might reload that
> information later. It could be very useful (for that
46 matches
Mail list logo
