On 04/07/2010 06:17 PM, Gary Funck wrote:
We have access to only a few of the listed platforms,
(and in the case of IA64 the underlying OS is SuSE not
"unknown-linux-gnu").
That does not matter. You're obviously not required to use Linux From
Scratch. :-) If you run "./config.guess" from the
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> :) We need debug info and hammer out all bugs of course! I would also like to
> see possiblity to LTO bootstrap without gold and possibility to not generate
> assembly into LTO .o files. In the typical use where one builds app with LTO
> (such as bootstra
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > :) We need debug info and hammer out all bugs of course! I would also
> > > like to
> > > see possiblity to LTO bootstrap without gold and possibility to not
> > > generate
> > > assembly into LTO .o fi
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > :) We need debug info and hammer out all bugs of course! I would also like
> > to
> > see possiblity to LTO bootstrap without gold and possibility to not generate
> > assembly into LTO .o files. In the typical use where one builds app with
> > LTO
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >
> > > > :) We need debug info and hammer out all bugs of course! I would also
> > > > like to
> > > > see possiblity to LTO bootstrap without gold and possibility to not
> > > > generate
> > > > assem
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 04:21, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Well, but it's pretty much deep-rooted into the LTO design as we use
> collect2 and/or gold to do symbol resolution which of course needs
> object code. I can imagine we can nuke the collect2 stuff looking
> at symbols, but the linker plugi
Hello,
I am currently trying to include GCC documentation into gNewSense
distribution, in info format. While most of GNU software documentation
is available directly from GNU site in info format (see
http://www.gnu.org/manual/manual.html), I'm surprised to see this is
not the case for GCC
On 4/9/10 08:08 , christophe.ja...@ouvaton.org wrote:
> I tried to "makeinfo -I include/ gcc.texi" inside extracted
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/docs-sources.tar.gz directory, but have
> the following error:
>
> include//gcc-common.texi:12: @include `gcc-vers.texi': No such file or
> directory
On 04/08/2010 09:59 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> The problem is that now the problem is present on a serial make (ala,
> "/src/configure && make").
I've reliably reproduced this. As far as I can tell, it's a problem
of makefile variable expansion in the top-level make.
For the folks just joining
What are the opinions here about merging
dragonegg into FSF gcc? It is in the odd position
of straddling two projects so perhaps it could
reside in both the LLVM and FSF gcc projects
with regularly remerging. Certainly it would be
an interesting addition to FSF gcc. For instance,
without even at
On 04/07/2010 10:48 PM, roy rosen wrote:
I saw in arm/neon.md that they have a similar problem:
...
Their solution is also not complete.
What is the proper way to handle such a case and how do I let gcc know
that this is a simple move instruction so that gcc would be able to
optimize it out?
Th
Jack Howarth wrote:
What are the opinions here about merging
dragonegg into FSF gcc? It is in the odd position
of straddling two projects so perhaps it could
reside in both the LLVM and FSF gcc projects
with regularly remerging. Certainly it would be
an interesting addition to FSF gcc.
What
On 04/09/2010 05:08 AM, christophe.ja...@ouvaton.org wrote:
Where may I find gcc-vers.texi?
It is created by the install.texi2html shell script, which also creates
the HTML output files that go on the web site. You can probably modify
this script to generate info files instead, but as Diego
On 04/08/2010 07:21 AM, Name lastlong wrote:
=error
checking for the correct version of the gmp/mpfr/mpc libraries... no
configure: error: Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.3.1+ and MPC 0.8.0+.
error
On 04/09/2010 05:08 AM, christophe.ja...@ouvaton.org wrote:
I am currently trying to include GCC documentation into gNewSense
distribution, in info format.
The binutils response to the same question reminds me that the same
answer works here. There are pre-built info files in our official
re
On 9 April 2010 17:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> I have no idea how to fix this. Ideas?
Maybe a dumb question, I don't know the context of this problem...
Is the only C++ header that causes a problem?
is exactly equivalent to because it only declares
macros, which are not in namespace std
In tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:may_be_unaligned_p(), we call
get_inner_reference to figure out bitpos, but we don't take into
account toffset - which may make the reference less aligned than we
expect. Is this supposed to be accounted for by STEP ? It doesn't
always work with nested arrays - STEP is
17 matches
Mail list logo
