Hi all,
I'm having a hard time figuring out how exactly pthread_cancel() works
in a C++ program. It seems that a thread cancellation is somewhat
similar to throwing an exception. But I couldn't find any proof or
details about it. I'm not even sure this topic is gcc-relevant but
hope someone can li
On 2 February 2010 08:26, Christian Fröbel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a hard time figuring out how exactly pthread_cancel() works
> in a C++ program. It seems that a thread cancellation is somewhat
> similar to throwing an exception. But I couldn't find any proof or
> details about it. I'm not
On 01/29/2010 08:56 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hey!
With my last patch, we only have 3 instances of dominator tree walks
left in the tree, all in the TM ipa pass.
I believe we can leave those as they are, since the TM ipa pass runs
early enough that nothing has altered control flow such that
cod
Does Modulo Scheduling work on x86 platforms? I have tried adding in
various versions of the -fmodulo-sched option and get the exact same
output with or without. The application is a very simplistic matrix
multiply without dependencies.
Thank you,
Cameron Palmer
While preparing a revision of the sections in `Installing GCC' relevant
to my platforms, I've just read it front-to-back and found a couple of
problems I'd like to discuss before starting to develop patches.
* As a general note, many sections describe mechanism (which configure
options are avail
Rainer Orth writes:
> I don't want this to be merely a rant, so I plan next to revise the
> specific instructions for my targets and then try and come up with a
> suggestion for a clearer structure for the configuration chapter, though
> I fear that much of this will be 4.6 material. After askin
Hi Ian, Thank you for your reply.
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Jon Grant writes:
I see that some of the files are located in the -L library directory
specified, crtbegin.o, crtend.o in which case, perhaps they both do
not need their full long path specified.
Most linkers do not use the -L path t
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:
> * The guide is far from complete: e.g., the libstdc++ configure options
> are missing completely (they are documented in the XML/HTML manual,
> but there's not even a pointer to that in the installation guide). I
I noted that issue at least as far bac
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20100202 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20100202/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Jon writes:
> Is there a way to get collect2 to save the temporary .c file it
> generates to have a look at it? I believe it may be the __main()
> function, with the -debug option it gives the attached
> gplusplus_collect2_log.txt, looking at the [/tmp/ccyBAI9V.c] file
> though it is empty, any i
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 01:26 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
[...]
> As I see the issue, you should first check over the next months that the
> feature is not deprecated by ISO.
I know, I tried to talk about it on std.c++. I am afraid I can not see
a consens
> I see that what I need is an assignment for all future changes. If my
> employer is not involved with any contributions of mine, the employer
> disclaimer is not needed, right ?
It's safest to have it. The best way to prove that your employer is
not involved with any contributions of yours is w
On 2/2/10 7:19 PM, Richard Kenner wrote:
I see that what I need is an assignment for all future changes. If my
employer is not involved with any contributions of mine, the employer
disclaimer is not needed, right ?
It's safest to have it. The best way to prove that your employer is
not in
13 matches
Mail list logo
