[ Redirecting to the main list. Are any of the LTO maintainers able to
comment on this? ]
Background: We have a problem on non-ELF platforms, because LTO generates
section names with asterisks in them (based on the DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME of
various decls), which may be OK for section names within
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20091231 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20091231/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
I've got a bit of a quandry here and would like the advice
of people who are more experienced than I am at C programming
and debugging.
We've got a legacy application that compiles and runs fine
using the following compilers/platforms:
HP-UX 11.23 (PA-RISC) ANSI-C and aC++ C.11.23.04
HP-UX 11
