Hi All,
I just joined the list and I'm not a compiler guru, so I'd like "the
list" opinion on a behavior I notice today.
Not sure it is really a bug, so do not want to directly open a bug in
the bugzilla repository.
Consider the below sample code:
#include
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
On 12/10/2009 01:03 PM, sergio borghese wrote:
> Now my question is: is it correct that the compiler enforces the
> constantness of the variable, even tought it states in the warning
> that the const qualifier has been discarded?
>
I think you are missing that the compiler is not "enforcing" any
2009/12/10 sergio borghese:
>
> Now my question is: is it correct that the compiler enforces the
> constantness of the variable, even tought it states in the warning
> that the const qualifier has been discarded?
the calls to printf can be optimised to printf("i: %dn", 0) so it
doesn't use the val
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20091210 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20091210/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Hi,
I have a problem about RTL sequence.
If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule them.
Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
emit_insn(reg0, operands[0]);
emit_insn(reg1, reg0);
emit_insn(operands[0], reg1);
But gcc will will re
daniel tian writes:
> I have a problem about RTL sequence.
> If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule
> them.
> Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
>
> emit_insn(reg0, operands[0]);
> emit_insn(reg1, reg0);
> emit_insn(operands[0],
2009/12/11 Ian Lance Taylor :
> daniel tian writes:
>
>> I have a problem about RTL sequence.
>> If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule
>> them.
>> Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
>>
>> emit_insn(reg0, operands[0]);
>> emit_insn(re
I'm tring this function, but it have some problems. It seems not link
the new insn in the double-list.
void merge(rtx insn1,rtx insn2)
{
rtx par, pre,sur, insn;
par = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (SFmode, rtvec_alloc (2));
XVECEXP (par, 0, 0) = PATTERN(insn1);
XVECEXP (par, 0
daniel tian writes:
> 2009/12/11 Ian Lance Taylor :
>> daniel tian writes:
>>
>>> I have a problem about RTL sequence.
>>> If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to schedule
>>> them.
>>> Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
>>>
>>> emit_insn(reg0, o
I think you should do the operation with the functions in emit-rtl.c.
Like the functions:add_insn_after, add_insn_before, df_insn_delete.
You could try those things.
2009/12/11 Jianzhang Peng :
> I'm tring this function, but it have some problems. It seems not link
> the new insn in the double-l
>> Does there any solution in RTL level?
>> Because I already solve the problem in ASM output level, exactly the
>> same solution as you suggest in this email.
>> I may need do some optimization later. So RTL level will be great!
>
> As far as I know there is no way to do this at the RTL level. I
Ian:
By the way, I don't underand the start_sequence and end_sequence.
What does those function mean.
I checked the source code in emit-rtl.c.
I still can't figure out what they do.
There is a structure sequence_stack, I don't what it does.
Thanks.
Hi,
Im trying to identify all indirect references in a loop so that, after
this analysis, I have a list of tree_nodes of pointer_type that are
dereferenced in a loop along with their step size, if any.
E.g.
while(i++ < n)
{
*(p+i);
}
I want to get the pointer_type_node for 'p' and identify th
daniel tian writes:
> By the way, I don't underand the start_sequence and end_sequence.
> What does those function mean.
> I checked the source code in emit-rtl.c.
> I still can't figure out what they do.
> There is a structure sequence_stack, I don't what it does.
start_sequence and end_
> > There is a structure sequence_stack, I don't what it does.
>
> start_sequence and end_sequence are used to group insns into a
> specific location when you are generating insns. I quote the comment
> in emit-rtl.c:
And sequence_stack exists so you can arbitrarily nest insn sequences.
Quoting daniel tian :
Hi,
I have a problem about RTL sequence.
If I wanna generate the RTL in sequence, and don't let gcc to
schedule them.
Like the following(all the variable is rtx):
emit_insn(reg0, operands[0]);
emit_insn(reg1, reg0);
emit_insn(operands[0], reg
16 matches
Mail list logo