Hi Geert!
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:44:11 UTC, Geert Bosch
wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 18:40, Paul Smedley wrote:
> > I'm wanting to update the GNU ADA compiler for OS/2... I'm currently
> > building GCC 4.3.x and 4.4.x on OS/2 (C/C++/fortran) but for ADA
> > configure complains about not find
> With 4.4, IRA happens to reuse the same register for both pseudos, so
> sched2 is hand tied and cannot schedule them back again for us.
I can imagine compiling other programs for which preserving the 4.3 allocation
will induce performance degradation due to spilling.
The register allocator t
Hi All!
While modifying the C lexer to accommodate it for experimental
C-derived language front-end, I've stumbled across the following
comment in gcc/c-common.h before the "enum rid" definition (still
there in gcc-4.5-20090820 snapshot):
42 /* Reserved identifiers. This is the union of all the
Geert Bosch wrote:
On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:32, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
GNAT doesn't build for arm-rtems on 4.4.x or
SVN (PR40775). I went back to 4.3.x since I
remembered it building.
I have run the ACATS on an ep7312 target and
get a number of generic test failures that
don't look RTEMS s
Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
> No problem, thanks for worrying about it. Are there any particular
> recommendations about/against problematic separator characters in the 's'
> command? I was going to use an '@'.
The Autoconf manual suggests using 's|||' rather than 's,,,', since ',' and
Paul Smedley wrote:
With GNAT 3.15p did it also depend on an existing gnat? or that one
built directory from source?
Building GNAT from sources always requires an existing Ada compiler
since the front end is written in Ada. However, binary versions of
3.15p for OS/2 are around.
This version
Bradley Lucier writes:
> and RBX is used by XLAT, XLATB.
XLAT* is generally not used anymore, certainly not in gcc generated code.
> Are 12 registers not enough, in principle, to do scheduling before
> register allocation?
You want to limit gcc to only 12 registers?
> I was getting a 15% sp
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Geert Bosch wrote:
On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:32, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
GNAT doesn't build for arm-rtems on 4.4.x or
SVN (PR40775). I went back to 4.3.x since I
remembered it building.
I have run the ACATS on an ep7312 target and
get a number of generic test fa
Eric Blake wrote:
> Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> No problem, thanks for worrying about it. Are there any particular
>> recommendations about/against problematic separator characters in the 's'
>> command? I was going to use an '@'.
>
> The Autoconf manual suggests using 's|||' rath
On 08/26/2009 05:36 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Jason Merrill wrote on Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:32:05PM CEST:
The problem is that AC_CHECK_DECLS gets confused by overloaded
functions, and glibc 2.10 has overloaded declarations of basename
and some other string functions for const-correctness.
"Alexei I. Adamovich" writes:
> While modifying the C lexer to accommodate it for experimental
> C-derived language front-end, I've stumbled across the following
> comment in gcc/c-common.h before the "enum rid" definition (still
> there in gcc-4.5-20090820 snapshot):
>
> 42 /* Reserved identifie
The kernel folk here at Red Hat have given me a test case (which I'll be
happy to forward, along a complete patch vs mainline) which gets
miscompiled because we never get around to adding all of the appropriate
blocks outgoing from an asm-goto to the simulation.
I can't figure out why the VARY
Mark Mitchell codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The trunk is in Stage 1. As previously stated, we expect that Stage 1
> will last through at least the end of August.
>
> In my opinion, the single hardest issue we face with respect to 4.5 is
> how to handle the VTA branch.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys
I am having problems in building my front-end again, so i'll show you
the output.
lang_init_options...
argv[0] = ./host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/gpy1
argv[1] = -v
argv[2] = foo.lg
argv[3] = -Wall
lang_handle_option!
scode = 37
lang_post_options
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20090827 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20090827/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
My guess, witjout seeing the testcase.
In ccp_initialize we have:
for (i = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
{
gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (i);
bool is_varying = surely_varying_stmt_p (stmt);
if (is_varying)
{
tree d
Please provide more information, like here
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
It turned out to be the following:
In multi source compile mode, I ggc_free() the data in dwarf2out.c after
code generation for a file is done. (I found that I need this because
otherwise the assembly code generated for file_2 to file_N of a compile
job will carry leftovers from the code generated
18 matches
Mail list logo
