On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:36 +0800, Li Feng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Below is the proposal of this gSoc project. I'd really like you review and
> comment on this and then I can plan this project better.
Hi Li,
this looks nice. Thanks for your work on this.
Tobias
>
> Thanks,
> Li Feng
> -
I've finished the first round of testing on all targets and will be
sending patches soon.
Overall, I think the results are quite satisfying.
For the current bunch of files, I get the same code on the following
targets:
m32c crx mmix xstormy16 fr30 v850 m32r iq2000 picochip mcore spu ia64
m68
Hi Tobi,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Grosser
wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:36 +0800, Li Feng wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Below is the proposal of this gSoc project. I'd really like you review and
>> comment on this and then I can plan this project better.
>
> Hi Li,
>
> this looks ni
Hi.
I wrote to gcc mail list some time ago about my work on new RPC system.
So it has auto-parallelization for functions and uses GCC wrapper
compiler to do this job.
May be you will find it interesting in repect with your job.
Project site is - crpc.sf.net
Andrey.
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I have these patches against 4.3.2/4.3.3 that should help with this.
>> (Sorry Eric, I've been too busy with the cygwin gcc distro releases to
>> start feeding these upstream yet, but they need to wait for 4.5 anyway.
>> They're not all in entirely suitable shape yet eit
Hi,
I'd like to open the issue of minimum GMP/MPFR versions for gcc-4.5. We
currently require gmp-4.1 and mpfr-2.3.0 to build GCC.
Part of my motivation is that MPC requires more recent versions of these
packages. But also older GMP/MPFR have known bugs and I'd like to encourage
upgrading
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
fedora/suse/ubuntu/... once and don't change installations for two or
three years (stable machine, etc.) it becomes increasi
From: "Steven Bosscher"
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
fedora/suse/ubuntu/... once and don't change installations for two or
three years (stable machin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20090326 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20090326/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
> your typical development box and how old are your distros?
>
OpenSuSE 10.3 (originally released Oct. 07):
gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
gmp-devel-32bit-4.2.1-58
mpfr-2.2.1-45
Tim Prince wrote:
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
your typical development box and how old are your distros?
For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
on fairly recent Fedora versions. All our internal GCC
test machines are Fedora 9 or 10 and 10 has
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:11:04PM -0700, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Tim Prince wrote:
> > Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> >
> >
> >> What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
> >> your typical development box and how old are your distros?
> >>
> >>
> For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
> on fairly re
Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:11:04PM -0700, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
your typical development box and how old are your distros?
For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
on fairly recent Fedora
13 matches
Mail list logo
