Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
>> I think you really need the Joern's optmize_related_values patch. Also see
>> PR33699.
>
> I wouldn't recommend that patch, but yes: Something that performs that
> optimization ;-)
Yes, something doing that using LCM
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to make modulo scheduling work more efficiently for our VLIW target. I
> found one serious issue that prevents current SMS algorithm from achieving
> high IPC is so-called "transitive closure" problem, where scheduling window
This is just a question. Hopefully someone can shed some light on what the
fixincludes stage of "make install" does. I am making the assumption that
the "make install" stage is where these headers get mangled or modified.
This is on Solaris 8 by the way.
Once make install has finished its job I
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> This is just a question. Hopefully someone can shed some light on what the
> fixincludes stage of "make install" does. I am making the assumption that
> the "make install" stage is where these headers get mangled or modified.
>
> This is on
>> Was it fixincludes or was it the mkheaders script ?
>>
>> and why ?
>
> Because system headers should not define something in the users namespace,
> certainly not a non-uglified three-letter name such as "sun".
>
> Consider
>
> #include
>
> int sun;
>
> which will not build otherwise.
I did
Ok, thanks for all this information and if you can dig that up it
would be nice too. I'll start looking at that patch and PR33699 to
see if I can adapt them to my needs. Any reason why you wouldn't
recommend it?
I will keep you posted of anything I do for latter reference,
Jean Christophe Beyler
Dear all,
I have a question about the way the machine description works and how
it affects the different passes of the compiler. I was reading the GNU
Compiler Collection Internals and I found this part (in section
14.8.1):
(define_insn ""
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 03:54:51PM -0500, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a question about the way the machine description works and how
> it affects the different passes of the compiler. I was reading the GNU
> Compiler Collection Internals and I found this part (in section
>
