Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)

2009-01-18 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > [Cc list trimmed] > > Richard Guenther wrote: >> Status >> == >> >> The trunk remains Stage 4, so only fixes for regressions (and changes >> to documentation) are allowed. > >Hello Richard, > > There are a number of bootstrap failures on

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-18 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 143460. > > The branch is still frozen and all checkins

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-18 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 143460. > > The branch is still frozen and all checkins

We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch

2009-01-18 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, This 4.3 regression: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905 is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3 regression: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36765 Since we didn't backport testcases to 4.3 branch, we didn't notice 4.3 regression when the packport was

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-18 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > > > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > > > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 14346

Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch

2009-01-18 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > Hi, > > This 4.3 regression: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905 > > is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3 > regression: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36765 It uncovered a latent problem. Of cou

Re: We should backport gcc 4.4 regression testcases to gcc 4.3 branch

2009-01-18 Thread H.J. Lu
On 1/18/09, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This 4.3 regression: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905 > > > > is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3 > > regression: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/b

Re: GCC 4.3.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2009-01-18 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> > >> > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from >> > >> > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ >> > >> > and

Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-18 Thread Dave Korn
Andy Scott wrote: > Again stage3 part of build, and this is what actually stops the build > the above issue doesn't seem to (I think it happens in stage 2), I get > the following: > > < a few more lines of log deleted :) > > ../../../gcc/libiberty/strsignal.c -o strsignal.o > ../../../gcc/libi

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-01-06)

2009-01-18 Thread Dave Korn
Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Dave Korn >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37660 >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38903 > > I guess the second one is a regression? Please mark the PR as such if this > is the case. :) No need now, ... >> f