Hi,
Consider 2 for loops as given below.
for (i = 1; i < N ; i++)
{
a[i] = 1;
}
for (i = 1; i < N ; i++)
{
j = j + a[i];
}
Their corresponding GIMPLE code looks like.
loop_2 (header = 6, latch = 7, niter = , upper_bound = 999, estimate = 999)
{
bb_6 (preds = {bb_
I'd like to implement something similar for MaverickCrunch, using the
integer 32-bit MAC functions, but there is no reciprocal estimate
function on the MaverickCrunch. I guess a lookup table could be
implemented, but how many entries will need to be generated, and how
accurate will it have to b
Hi,
Currently we save the entire register content for caller-saved
register, even though
only lower 4/8 bytes are used, as in the case of SSE math without
vectorizer. Is it
possible to only save the used portion of register content for
caller-saved register?
Thanks.
H.J.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Sandeep Maram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i_23 is the loop iterator of loop_2 . i_22 is the loop iterator of loop_1.
>
> How can I rename i_23 as i_22?
>
In lambda-code.c:1858 you have some code that does a similar renaming:
FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (stmt, imm_iter,
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20080509 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20080509/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, for folks with free cycles to spare, could you build the branch on
> your favourite target and report bugs? Bugzilla and/or email reports
> are OK. If you are creating a bugzilla report, please add my address to
> the CC field.
With the attached
I'm getting a " warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to
‘char*’" message in g++ (GCC) 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7).
I've always understood there is no such thing as deprecation in C++ (and
have been proud of this concept). What gives? Does the standards
committee allow deprecation
