On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
I don't have solaris11 either.
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
> Well, since it's not working I guess something got lost in translation? I
> don't have access to solaris11, can you please help?
the libm sources, including math_c99.h, are available for download from
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/devpro/downloads/current/
R
Hi Kaveh,
> I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
> on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
> GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
> begs the question, why do these fix hacks have th
Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Kaveh,
I notice that the solaris_math_* fix hacks all seems to have a bypass clause
on "GNUC". Sometimes the solaris headers try to be gcc-aware. Is there a
GNUC appearing in solaris11's /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h header? And that
begs the question, why do these fix
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rainer Orth wrote:
In c99-math-double-1.c, the first C99_MATH_TESTS invocation abort()s.
Single-stepping in gdb (which couldn't display the macro, even if
compiled
with -g3 ;-) revealed that this clause
if (fetestexcept (FE_ALL_EXCEPT) != 0) \
a
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Okay, thanks both of you for tracking this down.
So the solaris definition of isinf is not exception-safe in the presence
of nans. Try inserting this code into c99-math-double-1.c after it
includes math headers. (This is what fixincludes puts into the header
for solar
From: "Andreas Tobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ultra10:gcc/gcc/testsuite] andreast% svn diff gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
Index: gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c
===
--- gcc.dg/c99-math-double-1.c (revision 132096)
+++ gcc.dg/c99-math-double-
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Great, we're making progress.
On mainline only (not 4.2 or prior) does this work instead?
Yep, trunk.
[ultra10:gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg] andreast% diff -u
/usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.orig /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h
--- /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h.origMon Feb 4 21:55
Hallo,
Is there summarized table of ABI binary compatibility of following
compiled programs by ...?
1st. C (the core)
2nd. Fortran
3rd. C++
and 4th. GCJ's Java
between the 4.3.0, 4.2.3, 4.1.x, 4.0.x, 3.4.x and 3.3.x versions?
The comments are not for me, they are for everyones who need
maintain
J.C. Pizarro wrote:
2nd. Fortran
4.0.x: I don't know, but one should really not use that version
4,[1-3].x come with incompatible gfortran libraries, which have also
different version numbers: libgfortran.so.1 to libgfortran.so.3.
Minor versions are upward compatible, i.e. programs compiled wi
Richard Guenther wrote:
Status
==
We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation
fixes only. When we reach zero open P1 regressions, we will create a
release candidate for 4.3.0, branch and announce the opening of Stage 1
for 4.4.
make profiledbootstrap is still
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:38:06PM +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Is there summarized table of ABI binary compatibility of following
> compiled programs by ...?
>
> 1st. C (the core)
> 2nd. Fortran
> 3rd. C++
> and 4th. GCJ's Java
>
> between the 4.3.0, 4.2.3, 4.1.x, 4.0.x, 3.4.x and 3.
12 matches
Mail list logo
