I recently compiled the Debian archive on Alpha using trunk to identify
new issues before GCC 4.3 is released. I actually started a first
attempt in the middle of November but had to stop after about 2500
packages because of hardware problems. During my first attempt, I
found the following Alpha
> Could someone give some hints of how to describe a FMAC (float mult and
> add) insn in machine description, it matches d = b*c+a, which is a four
> operands float instrution. With a glimp through the array optabs[] in
> genopinit.c, it seems no OP handler could match FMAC operation?
Correct. I
I tried by referring the ia64.md, unfortunately it does not work. The
insn I wrote for FMAC is as follows,
(define_insn "maddsi4"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(plus:SI (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
(match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r"))
(match_ope
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:59:39AM -0800, Qing Wei wrote:
> I tried by referring the ia64.md, unfortunately it does not work. The
> insn I wrote for FMAC is as follows,
>
> (define_insn "maddsi4"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> (plus:SI (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> When we can't hint the real target, we want to hint the most common
>> target. There are potentially clever ways for the compiler to do this
>> automatically, but I'm most interested in giving the user some way to do
>>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> The bigger issue here, is that people seem to be using Bugzilla as a
>> kind-of TODO list for things may some day work on, but probably will
>
> I don't see any problem with that.
Me neither. In fact, I think there's a lo
Geert Bosch wrote:
> Nested functions aren't used that much in C indeed... :)
Paul, would you please review this patch?
> --- arm.c.orig 2007-11-20 16:27:04.0 -0500
> +++ arm.c 2007-11-21 18:15:18.0 -0500
> @@ -10448,6 +10448,14 @@ arm_get_frame_offsets (void)
>/* Save
On Dec 26, 2007, at 14:24, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Geert Bosch wrote:
Nested functions aren't used that much in C indeed... :)
Paul, would you please review this patch?
This patch isn't good. While it addressed the alignment
issue, it didn't correctly adjust all necessary offset
computations
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20071226 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20071226/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
