They are gaming or playing with the words of the language for Google.
If the world is global then
^^ what means "global optimizer" using the infraestructure for google? ^^.
Wow, paranoia is a new feature of J.C.'s messages.
Seriously, your future employers might search for your name in the
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
[...]
* "executable" means "it's from an execution to death of the e-prisoner"?
* "Indirect call promotion" means "this promotion indirectly e?"?
* "Dead variable elimination" means "elimination variable of R.I.P.s"?
* etc.
J.C.Pizarro i though
On Dec 12, 2007 10:48 PM, Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the mean time you might have to use only one thread and lots of
> memory to repack the gcc repo, or find the perfect memory allocator to
> be used with Git. After all, packing the whole gcc history to around
> 230MB is quite a
On 12/12/07 6:41 PM, Harvey Harrison wrote:
I'm curious how this interacts/complements with any efforts to
using the LLVM IR in LTO.
No. At least not at this moment. GCC uses its own IR (GIMPLE) as the
in-core and on-disk representation.
Any pointers to where that discussion ended up?
On 12/13/07 2:39 AM, Ollie Wild wrote:
The lto branch is already doing this, so presumably that discussion
was resolved (Maybe someone in the know should pipe up.).
Yes, streaming the IL to/from disk is a resolved issue.
I believe a stable representation is an explicit non-goal of the LTO
pr
> Yes, everything, by default you only get the more modern branches/tags,
> but it's all in there. If there is interest I can work with Bernardo
> and get the rest publically exposed.
I decided to give it a try, but could not find the tuples branch. Is
it too hard to make gimple-tuples-branch and
Is there an alternative to "git repack -a -d" that repacks everything
but the first pack?
That would be a pretty good idea for big repositories. If I were to
implement it, I would actually add a .git/config option like
pack.permanent so that more than one pack could be made permanent; then
Paolo Bonzini schrieb:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2007 10:48 PM, Nicolas Pitre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In the mean time you might have to use only one thread and lots of
>>> memory to repack the gcc repo, or find the perfect memory allocator to
>>> be used with Git. After a
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12/12/07 6:41 PM, Harvey Harrison wrote:
Any pointers to where that discussion ended up?
There was some discussion about merging LLVM and GCC a couple of
years back but nothing concrete came out of it.
The concrete thing that came out of
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:40 +, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> > Yes, everything, by default you only get the more modern branches/tags,
> > but it's all in there. If there is interest I can work with Bernardo
> > and get the rest publically exposed.
>
> I decided to give it a try, but could not fi
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 05:31:02PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
>
>The following targets have significantly more unexpected failures than
> before:
>
> mipsisa64-unknown-elf 841 -> 921 g++ (my results)
Results have recently improved dramatically to only 3 unexpected g++
failure
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini schrieb:
>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there an alternative to "git repack -a -d" that repacks everything
>>> but the first pack?
>>
>> That would be a pretty good idea for big repositories. If I were to
>> implement it, I would actually add a .git
hello all,
today i've run into this: if i cast a double value to an unsigned int
using the C style cast when passing it to printf, it's fine. however, if
i use the ctor style cast, i get a compile error. in theory, these two
should do the same: create a temporary unsigned int, and assign the
doubl
today i've run into this: if i cast a double value to an unsigned int
using the C style cast when passing it to printf, it's fine. however, if
i use the ctor style cast, i get a compile error. in theory, these two
should do the same: create a temporary unsigned int, and assign the
double to it aft
hi Tapani Tarvainen,
sorry for interrupt you. I searched a your mail in gnu-gcc maillist.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-01/msg00062.html
you said you have installed gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11,
but I really wasn't successfull on it. my step:
export CC=/opt/hp-gcc/bin/gcc (the gcc is binary gcc-3.
On Dec 14, 2007 1:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmmm... it is even documented in git-gc(1)... and git-index-pack(1) of
> > all things.
>
> I found that the .keep file is not transmitted over the network (at
> least I tried with git+ssh:// and http:// protocols), however.
I'm
how to compile gcc4 on cygwin?
thanks
17 matches
Mail list logo
