Za 24 sata mozete imati svoju Internet prezentaciju
po PROMOTIVNOJ CENI OD
4499 DINARA
Placanje u DVE (2) mesecne rate!
Zasto Vam je potrebna Internet prezentacija?
1. Da bi ste bili ispred konkurencije !!!
2. Svi mogu videti Vas Internet IZLOG !!!
3. SVI vAS MOGU BRZO I LAKO NACI
We have a lot of patches to the ARC port, but I suppose that would not really
be a problem for phase three, as the current arc port in the gcc mainline
is not really useful for end users - it doesn't support any of the cores
that have been released in recent years.
Some patches belong logically to
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2007 07:17:21 PM:
>
> I'm not entirely clear: how do you propose changing the code?
>
I was thinking of reordering the if tests such that we check if op0 is
already ok_for_base or op1 is ok_for_index before we check the inverse
conditions (which
> The score, sh and sparc instructions may or may not display canonical
> behavior; their ports do not define CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO and I was
> not able to find documentation of the relevant instruction.
The operation the nsb instruction of the SHmedia instruction set performs
is 'count number
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 17:55 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
>
> It seems stuck at 4.2.0 only.
>
> If I search around I cna find reports from Joe Buck that seem to help my
> work but there is nothing linked on the build status page.
That would be my fault,
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 17:55 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
>>
>> It seems stuck at 4.2.0 only.
>>
>> If I search around I cna find reports from Joe Buck that seem to help my
>> work but there is nothing linked on the build status page.
>
> That would be
Is there a particular reason for x86 and x86-64 global-dynamic TLS
model to require @PLT when calling __tls_get_addr when PIC isn't
required? See
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
Right now, gcc doesn't generate PLT when calling __tls_get_addr
without -fpic. Assert in x86/x8
Pat Haugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was thinking of reordering the if tests such that we check if op0 is
> already ok_for_base or op1 is ok_for_index before we check the inverse
> conditions (which result in swapping the classes of the operands). I would
> also change the default else leg s
The release of MPFR 2.3.0 is still imminent. Thanks very much to
those who tested the first release candidate. As there have been
significant changes, a second release candidate is necessary. You
can download it here:
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-2.3.0/mpfr-2.3.0-rc2.tar.bz2
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-2
On 8/12/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11 August 2007 08:42, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> > Sunzir Deepur wrote:
> >> so why are those class 3 edges created at all ?
> > I didn't see any 3-edges blocks at all in your example.
> Not 3-edge blocks; class 3 edges = the green lines.
>
> Th
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In expr.c, convert_move() tries to synthesize sign extension in modes
> larger than those directly supported by the target. There are two strategies
> for generating the sign bit copies:
>
> 1) Compare with 0 and use "slt" if STORE_FLAG_VA
Hi,
Some base classes (specifically thread base classes) would benefit from
being able to execute a function after the object is constructed and before
it is destructed. For a thread class the thread can't start until after the
object is constructed and must stop before the object is destru
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20070813 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20070813/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
13 matches
Mail list logo
