Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2007 09:55:45:
> Hello,
>
> > By "this change" I mean just commenting out the check in
> > doloop_condition_get. After applying the patch that introduced DOLOOP
> > patterns for SPU
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01470.html)
> > we ne
Hello,
> It doesn't seem that the number of iterations analysis from loop-iv.c deals
> with EQ closing branches.
loop-iv works just fine for EQ closing branches.
Zdenek
> One option is for sms to use
> doloop_condition_get/loop-iv analysis in their current form, and if failed
> check (on our ow
Hello
Mark Mitchell schrieb:
At this point, there are 153 P3 and higher regressions open against GCC
4.3.0. In reviewing those, I was struck by how many are in fact new
regressions in 4.3 -- problems that did not occur in previous releases.
These include a number of P1 problems such as:
Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2007 10:52:32:
> Hello,
>
> > It doesn't seem that the number of iterations analysis from loop-iv.c
deals
> > with EQ closing branches.
>
> loop-iv works just fine for EQ closing branches.
>
Thanks for the clarification (I didn't see EQ in iv_numbe
Hello,
> Since we didn't fail on assert in doloop_modify despite the hack in
> doloop_condition_get (removal of the condition check), I just restored the
> doloop_condition_get to it's original state and defined instead a new
> function called sms_condition_get which is a copy of doloop_condition_
Hello,
> > > It doesn't seem that the number of iterations analysis from loop-iv.c
> deals
> > > with EQ closing branches.
> >
> > loop-iv works just fine for EQ closing branches.
> >
>
> Thanks for the clarification (I didn't see EQ in iv_number_of_iterations's
> switch (cond)).
that is because
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 07:26:52PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > aclocal.m4 wasn't generated with libtool.md in top dir and
>
> There should not be any copy of libtool.m4 in aclocal.m4, since it is
> already included via m4_include. If you look at lib
Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2007 20:36:12:
> Hello,
>
> > > > It doesn't seem that the number of iterations analysis from
loop-iv.c
> > deals
> > > > with EQ closing branches.
> > >
> > > loop-iv works just fine for EQ closing branches.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the clarificati
"H.J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 07:26:52PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Please make sure that you have the right version of libtool installed
>> before running aclocal.
> For reason, aclocal.m4 always has AM_PROG_LIBTOOL from the installed
> libtool.m4. Does any
Apparently there are some fortran regressions caused by my patch.
The last time I modified the patch (which was before the freeze), I
did a test of C, C++, Fortran, objc.
After the freeze ended, I did an svn update in that tree, bootstrapped
and regtested c/c++, and committed it.
Other than the
10 matches
Mail list logo
