On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 12:35:32AM +0200, Thomas Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as of revision 125076, tree-vect-transform.c contains the following code
> in line 2010:
>
> enum tree_code code, code1 = CODE_FOR_nothing, code2 = CODE_FOR_nothing;
SVN can help you find out who added that piece of cod
On OSX 10.3.9 compiling gcc4-4.3.0-20070525 failed with:
...
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070526/darwin_objdir/gcc/gcj
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070526/darwin_objdir/powerpc-apple-darwin7/libjava/
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070526
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On OSX 10.3.9 compiling gcc4-4.3.0-20070525 failed with:
...
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070526/darwin_objdir/gcc/gcj
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070526/darwin_objdir/powerpc-apple-darwin7/libjava/
-B/sw/src
Mike and Eric,
The gfortran developers are wondering if Darwin PPC will
ever have PR24685 and PR25477 fixed. Looking at this again
I noticed a proposed patch which I seemed to have missed when
I last looked into this issue...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01545.html
http://gcc.g
Hi Everyone,
As an FYI, LLVM 2.0 was released on Wednesday. This is a critical
release for us, with many new features, optimizer improvements, and
compile-time speedups. Among other things, this release add support
for many missing GCC extensions, so we can now build things like
mozilla
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Tim Prince wrote:
> I spent quite a while getting out of the tangle I got into when I built
> mpfr and gmp with --disable-shared, leaving older incompatible shared
> libraries in the path. No doubt, it can be made to work, but with
> plenty of ways to go wrong.
The above isn
While looking at Andrew's patch for fixing the long double issue
on Darwin PPC, I noticed something interesting in the symbols in the
object files created for gcc/libgfortran/generated. Some of these
object files have symbols with the proper $LDBL128 appended on Darwin PPC.
For example...
nm rr
A quick stab at changing...
specific__exp_r16 = exp (parm)
to
specific__exp_r16 = expl (parm)
...in gcc/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90
produced the followimg compilation error on
Darwin PPC...
../../../gcc-4.2-20070526/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90:47.23
pilation error on
> Darwin PPC...
>
> ../../../gcc-4.2-20070526/libgfortran/generated/_exp_r16.F90:47.23:
>
>specific__exp_r16 = expl (parm)
> 1
> Error: Function reference to 'expl' at (1) is to a non-PURE procedure within
> a PURE procedure
W