Hi all,
I am having some issues while generating debug info for frame related
instructions in fuction_prologue (for GCC 4.1.1) for a private target.
(fr30 & cris backend also showed similiar error while dumping the
debug info).
For my target, while generating the stack frame for local variable,
"Rohit Arul Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Is the REG NOTE provided for the dwarf code proper?
Yes.
> 2. What is the reason for readelf error?
I don't know. Sounds like a bug somewhere.
Ian
Dear all,
I compiled and linked a framework (GenPar) with GCC 3.4.6 and the framework
worked perfectly.
I tried to compile and link the same framework with GCC 4.1.1 and I got many
errors:
[/usr/bin/g++ -Wall -W -DNDEBUG -O3 -Wno-deprecated -c KategProblemTest.C -o
Linux/KategProblemTest.o
m
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:57:38AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:49:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>The last time I looked into it, the reason was use of MMX
> >> instructions without (f)emms afterwards.
> >
> > Yeah:
> > [...]
> > (and
gcc-4.2.0 test-results for sparc64-linux and cygwin are posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01187.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01186.html
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
Hi,
I have the following code:
namespace X
{
namespace Y
{
namespace Z
{
struct A { typedef int int_t; };
struct Z { typedef int int_t; };
}
}
}
using namespace X::Y::Z;
int
main()
{
Z::A::int_t i = 0;
Z::Z::int_t j = 0;
return i == j;
}
I used the comma
On 5/24/07, Ching, Jimen (US SSA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have the following code:
namespace X
{
namespace Y
{
namespace Z
{
struct A { typedef int int_t; };
struct Z { typedef int int_t; };
}
}
}
using namespace X::Y::Z;
int
main()
{
Z::A::int_t i = 0;
> > namespace X
> > {
> > namespace Y
> > {
> > namespace Z
> > {
> > struct A { typedef int int_t; };
> > struct Z { typedef int int_t; }; } } }
> >
> > using namespace X::Y::Z;
> >
> > int
> > main()
> > {
> > Z::A::int_t i = 0;
> > Z::Z::int_t j = 0;
> > r
