M
1 - YMMV, YGWYPF, PPINGOFR
I got the first two, but what does the last one mean?
Wow, you're impressive... The second one I thought would be too cryptic
for all.
I got the second one too. Italians must be good at acronyms. :-)
BTW, the tentative timeline says that 4.3 stage 1 will end
Hi developers,
for this http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-05/msg00451.html
you have this nice cleanup's patch of gcc/loop.c that transliterates the logic
of the uses of the loop_invariant_p (..) and consec_sets_invariant_p (..)
functions.
I've patched it, builded and executed, and again again wi
> >The pretty print routines could definitely use a lot of cases
> >(dump_gimple_stmt), and the work is very self contained.
>
> So I took a look at this the other day, and you seem to have at least
> every case that has accessors.
>
> Did you want me to write accessors for the other types and th
> you have this nice cleanup's patch of gcc/loop.c that transliterates the
> logic of the uses of the loop_invariant_p (..) and consec_sets_invariant_p
> (..) functions.
First of all, patches should be posted to gcc-patches@, not to this list.
> I've patched it, builded and executed, and again ag
building snapshot gcc4-4.3.0-2007051 failed with:
...
# @multilib_dir@ is not really necessary, but sometimes it has
# more uses than just a directory name.
/bin/sh ../../../gcc-4.3-20070519/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs .
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070519/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src
Sorry, but I have just realized that I have forgotten to
give the OS: OSX 10.3.9, PPC.
Also the last week snapshot built without problem.
TIA
Dominique
J.C.,
4.1 is a stable branch. Only patches that fix serious regressions are
committed. Thus, your patch cannot be accepted. If your patch is not
applicable to 4.3 (which is the current unstable branch) then we are
sorry. Please, ask next time before start working in a patch.
Cheers,
Manuel.
P.
2007/5/19, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Please do not cross post between lists and do not send useless attachments.]
> I've patched it, builded and executed, and again again with this patched
> gcc. It's OK.
You apparently didn't read my previous message carefully. The patch is
re
2007/5/19, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric, what "reason previous stated"?
"loop.c is gone in the mainline sources. Patching it on the 4.1 branch is
allowed only if you have a testcase that exposes a serious bug."
--
Eric Botcazou
Yes! There is an serious bug! It's illegible
J.C. Pizarro wrote:
2007/5/19, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric, what "reason previous stated"?
"loop.c is gone in the mainline sources. Patching it on the 4.1
branch is
allowed only if you have a testcase that exposes a serious bug."
--
Eric Botcazou
Yes! There is an serio
On 5/19/07, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes! There is an serious bug! It's illegible, unreadable, illogical,
incomprehensible, dirty, heavy, ..
And that is the reason why loop.c was removed during 4.2's
development. If you don't get that 4.1 is a release branch and is
only open fo
On Sat, 19 May 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> If this message doesn't appear in gcc@gcc.gnu.org and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as in this subject then
> they are censuring me and yours.
Please stop this nonsense, and find yourself a different playground
from the GCC lists.
Gerald
We tried to be polite but I guess that there are actually poisonous
people [*] out there. How weird! I truly believed he was just a bit
lost/confused.
[*] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645
On 19/05/07, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007,
Comparing the log of successful and failed builds I have found
that the failed one contains -mdynamic-no-pic which does not
appear in the previous build. According Apple's doc this
should be used in "application", but it should not appear
when building libraries (at least it is my understanding).
Hi,
Our host(1) has asked us to release 5U from our 9U farm, there is no
delay for this request but since they have been hosting us freely
and reliably for nearly two years I'd like to respond as quickly
as possible.
FSF France has funding for the purchase of new hardware for up
to 10 000 euros (
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Comparing the log of successful and failed builds I have found
that the failed one contains -mdynamic-no-pic which does not
appear in the previous build. According Apple's doc this
should be used in "application", but it should not appear
when building libraries (at l
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I got the first two, but what does the last one mean?
>> Wow, you're impressive... The second one I thought would be too cryptic
>> for all.
>
> I got the second one too. Italians must be good at acronyms. :-)
IMBGAA!
...BTTOWWTD!!!
>>> BTW, the tentative timeline
17 matches
Mail list logo
