Dear Sir
On behalf of the board and management of Overseas Credit Commission(OCC).
London UK, I Mr Ayo West, the Operations Manager wishes to inform
you that your consignment/fund tagged diplomatic lugagge 122 with
Ref:No1226/X42/206 which was deposited in our vault for safe keeping by a
Diplomati
On 5/7/07, Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan. Hi folks.
People (ok, so it was Dan) had asked if there was anything they could do to
help the tuples effort.
The pretty print routines could definitely use a lot of cases
(dump_gimple_stmt), and the work is very self contained.
So
Andreas,
I have posted my results for backporting r120684, 120801,
120853, 120874 and 120977 to gcc 4.2.0 onto gcc-testresults
for i686-apple-darwin8 and powerpc-apple-darwin8...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg00822.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg00849.
-20070518.patch.bz2
--
Eyal Lebedinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
attach .zip as .dat
On Apr 21, 2007, at 6:01 PM, Bradley Lucier wrote:
So I'm wondering whether certain options have to be included on the
command line to get the benefits of -fstrict-aliasing.
I've thought about this question a bit more, so maybe I can make it
less content-free.
The C code generated by Gam
Hello,
I know it's way early to ask, but has a release plan
already been set for the 4.3 release? A gross estimation
of the expected release date would be sufficient.
I'm asking because I need to decide whether I need to do
the effort to backport a few things to 4.2 or I can rely
on the compiler
Hi all,
my system is based on SuSE Linux 8.1. Hardware is dual PIII
(2x933MHz, 1GB RAM, MSI 694D Pro (6321)).
config.guess gives
i686-pc-linux-gnu
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-suse-linux/3.4.6/specs
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix
--prefix=/usr --wit
On May 18, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
has a release plan already been set for the 4.3 release?
Just take the dates between 4.1 and 4.2, and add to the 4.2, and
presto, you have the 4.3 times... Or, put another way, about 15
months from now.[1]
1 - YMMV, YGWYPF, PPINGOFR
Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 18, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>> has a release plan already been set for the 4.3 release?
>
> Just take the dates between 4.1 and 4.2, and add to the 4.2, and
> presto, you have the 4.3 times... Or, put another way, about 15
> months from now.[1]
On 5/18/07, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Come on, 4.3 doesn't look in such a bad shape!
It will soon, when the stage1 projects are finally merged into the trunk.
BTW, the tentative timeline says that 4.3 stage 1 will end
4 months *ago*:
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timel
On May 18, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Come on, 4.3 doesn't look in such a bad shape!
I'll let history decide...
1 - YMMV, YGWYPF, PPINGOFR
I got the first two, but what does the last one mean?
Wow, you're impressive... The second one I thought would be too
cryptic for
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20070518 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20070518/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
this?
>
> patch is here:
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~eyaleb/gcc-current-libmudflap-20070518.patch.bz2
An important bit: the problem only shows up when code is executed from
a shared-object constructor.
The attached script demonstrates the problem, note the violation for stderr
when used insid
13 matches
Mail list logo
