Re: Problems with compiling svn trunk [libdecnumber]

2007-05-17 Thread Paolo Bonzini
You are compiling in the source directory which is not a well supported way of compiling GCC. Yeah, but I wasn't and still ran into that (or similar) problem. :) Anyway, this patch solves it: Index: libgcc/configure.ac === ---

TroubleAgent.de

2007-05-17 Thread TroubleAgent.de
...der Profi in Sachen Beziehungsmanagement! Die TroubleAgentur ist ein Dienstleister bestehend aus freiberuflichen Beratern, der den Menschen helfen soll, sich in verschiedenen Lebensphasen, wie z.B.: Partnersuche, Familiengründung, Trennung, Tod, oder Einsamkeit zurecht zufinden. Es fällt v

Re: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Guenther
On 5/17/07, Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 16, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >Currently gcc 4.2.0 suffers from 90 libjava failures on i686- > apple-darwin8 > including the boehm gctest. Backporting the changes from revision > 120684... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/view

gcc-4.2 manuals: GNU OpenMP Manual?

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Franke
Should section "GCC 4.2.0 manuals" of http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ not also list the "GNU OpenMP Manual" that is available for 4.2? Thanks Daniel

RE: gcc-4.2 manuals: GNU OpenMP Manual?

2007-05-17 Thread Dave Korn
On 17 May 2007 12:18, Daniel Franke wrote: > Should section "GCC 4.2.0 manuals" of > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ > > not also list the "GNU OpenMP Manual" that is available for 4.2? > Yes, it probably should. The released docs have been prepared correctly: http://gcc.gnu.org/onli

Re: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?

2007-05-17 Thread Jack Howarth
Richard, A test build of r120684 applied to gcc 4.2.0 on powerpc-apple-darwin8 doesn't show the same Process_5 failure but rather a single Process_1 failure. Interestingly all the Thread_Sleep_2 failures I normally see disappeared. Hopefully some of the libjava developers can shed some light on

Re: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?

2007-05-17 Thread Jack Howarth
Doh! Perhaps I need to add this as well (which went into four days after r120684... 2007-01-15 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * os_dep.c (defined(MPROTECT_VDB) && defined(DARWIN)): Adjust mail reference. (catch_exception_raise): Fix typo in the I386 exc_state. I'

Re: Problems with compiling svn trunk [libdecnumber]

2007-05-17 Thread mark
> >>You are compiling in the source directory which is not a well > >>supported way of compiling GCC. To confirm this theory - yes, make completed with most targets when built from a different directory than the source directory. I should have read the latest install instructions carefully. On Th

Re: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?

2007-05-17 Thread Jack Howarth
It also looks like we need... r120874 | mrs | 2007-01-17 15:12:51 -0500 (Wed, 17 Jan 2007) | 2 lines * os_dep.c: Fix i686-apple-darwin9 builds. in addition to r120801 for r120684 to work. I am also unclear if I should be regenerating include/gc_config.h.in as well as was done in r1208

Re: trimming excess errors from -Werror

2007-05-17 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
And also error when I add "-g" Excellent, thanks for the feedback. I believe that the modified configure test will solve this issue, and will be monitoring gcc-testresults for confirmation. best, benjamin

Re: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?

2007-05-17 Thread Andreas Tobler
Jack Howarth wrote: Doh! Perhaps I need to add this as well (which went into four days after r120684... 2007-01-15 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * os_dep.c (defined(MPROTECT_VDB) && defined(DARWIN)): Adjust mail reference. (catch_exception_raise): Fix typo in t

I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514

2007-05-17 Thread J.C. Pizarro
I suppose that there are some bugs in the snapshot gcc-4.1-20070514. gcc/rtl.h - /* Register Transfer Language EXPRESSIONS CODE CLASSES */ enum rtx_class { /* We check bit 0-1 of some rtx class codes in the predicates below. */ /* Bit 0 = comparison if 0, arithmetic is 1 #<-wro

Re: I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514

2007-05-17 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I suppose that there are some bugs in the snapshot gcc-4.1-20070514. Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick one of them and try to fix it. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514

2007-05-17 Thread J.C. Pizarro
2007/5/18, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose that there are some bugs in the snapshot gcc-4.1-20070514. Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick one of them and try to fix it. -- Eric Botcazou How? I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

Re: I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514

2007-05-17 Thread David Fang
> > Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick > > one of them and try to fix it. > > > How? > I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ because has not the > 'browse' button. Ah, the joys of bugzilla. For 4.1 issues, you can go to GCC's front page and under P

Re: I don't understand some of gcc-4.1-20070514

2007-05-17 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ because has not the > 'browse' button. Well, your favorite browser very likely hasn't got one either and yet you can browse the Internet, so there must be a similar way with Bugzilla... Hint: look for a button called 'Search'. -- Eric Botcazou