hi
i am Anshul goel doing MS in VLSI.
i am not getting in which file tokens are generated in c - gcc.
Please send me file name with complete path , as soon as possible.
thank you...
I have a Pentium-4 HT 521 running in 64 bit mode here, which seems to have a
branch prediction or prefetch misfeature. Here is an example:
// stall.c
typedef int (*fn)(void*);
int nop(void* ip)
{
fn *next=((fn*)ip)+1;
#ifdef HEIMLICH
// choked?
if (ip==0) abort();
#e
On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's)
stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s):
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-chec
Christian Joensson writes:
> On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's)
> stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s):
Did you do a total rebuild of all gcc in a clean directory? You need
to.
Andrew.
2007/5/2, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Christian Joensson writes:
> On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's)
> stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s):
Did you do a total rebuild of all gcc in a clean directory? You need
to.
yep, s
"anshul goel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am not getting in which file tokens are generated in c - gcc.
> Please send me file name with complete path , as soon as possible.
Please do not send e-mail to both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This kind of question is appropriate for
Hi,
java is currently not bootstrapping on s390. The problem appears
to be that the __ffssi libgcc function is not exported since it is
not listed in libgcc-std.ver.
Here are the details:
Building the gcj-dbtool linking against libgcj.so the following error
is reported:
/build2/gcc-4.3-build/
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> If it is ok to simply add that symbol to libgcc-std.ver in which category it
> would belong?
> I see "# libgcc1 integer symbols" in that file. Would that be appropriate?
You add it in the symbol versions for the next release, i.e. under
GCC_4.3.0.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: Sjodin, Jan
> Cc: Diego Novillo; Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Information about LTO
>
> On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...well sort of.
If I use the releases straight, I get this:
In file included from ../../gcc-4.2.0-20070430/gcc/libgcc2.c:35:
./tm.h:5:29: error: config/avr/avr.h: No such file or directory
./tm.h:6:28: error: config/dbxelf.h: No such file or directory
./tm.h:7:31: error: config/tm-dwarf2.h: No s
On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 20:08:25 Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.2 RC2 is now available from:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070430
>
> There is a known serious problem with RC2: Ada does not build.
> Therefore, there will be an RC3 shortly.
there're two more 4.2-only problems w
Seongbae Park wrote:
> On 5/1/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 01 May 2007 14:28:07 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I agree that it would be appropriate to backport the patch to gcc 4.2.
>>
>> Lets first get the patch which fixes the ICE regression that thi
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501
This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2.
At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the
various open issues, and available patches, so I might ch
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an option to gcc/g++ to make it generate a
warning/error when an assignment is used as a truth value in an
expression.
The -Wall option does this. But it can be silenced with parentheses.
The problem is, macros often use parentheses around expressions. Thus,
this w
The RTEMS community is still building and trying to test RC2.
We always build with newlib.
Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
I am now building the complete RTEMS source tree and tests
for every board and multilib. The
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
> build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
Understood, and thnanks for testing!
I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities
for general testing; they're final release candidates
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool
build and has filed or updated PRs for those.
Understood, and thnanks for testing!
I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities
for general testing; the
On 5/2/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seongbae Park wrote:
> On 5/1/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 01 May 2007 14:28:07 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I agree that it would be appropriate to backport the patch to gcc 4.2.
>>
>> Lets first
18 matches
Mail list logo