where tokens are generated

2007-05-02 Thread anshul goel
hi i am Anshul goel doing MS in VLSI. i am not getting in which file tokens are generated in c - gcc. Please send me file name with complete path , as soon as possible. thank you...

Strange timings on nocona/prescott with indirect jumps/calls

2007-05-02 Thread Marco Manfredini
I have a Pentium-4 HT 521 running in 64 bit mode here, which seems to have a branch prediction or prefetch misfeature. Here is an example: // stall.c typedef int (*fn)(void*); int nop(void* ip) { fn *next=((fn*)ip)+1; #ifdef HEIMLICH // choked? if (ip==0) abort(); #e

Bootstrap comparison differnce(s) on cygwin with 4.2.0 RC3: ./ada/exp_aggr.o differs

2007-05-02 Thread Christian Joensson
On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's) stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s): Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1objplus-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-chec

Re: Bootstrap comparison differnce(s) on cygwin with 4.2.0 RC3: ./ada/exp_aggr.o differs

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Christian Joensson writes: > On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's) > stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s): Did you do a total rebuild of all gcc in a clean directory? You need to. Andrew.

Re: Bootstrap comparison differnce(s) on cygwin with 4.2.0 RC3: ./ada/exp_aggr.o differs

2007-05-02 Thread Christian Joensson
2007/5/2, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Christian Joensson writes: > On cygwin, with D. Korn's proposed patch to cygwin's (i.e., newlib's) > stdio.h, I get a bootstrap failure do to comparison difference(s): Did you do a total rebuild of all gcc in a clean directory? You need to. yep, s

Re: where tokens are generated

2007-05-02 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"anshul goel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i am not getting in which file tokens are generated in c - gcc. > Please send me file name with complete path , as soon as possible. Please do not send e-mail to both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] This kind of question is appropriate for

__ffssi2 not exported in libgcc_s.so

2007-05-02 Thread Andreas Krebbel
Hi, java is currently not bootstrapping on s390. The problem appears to be that the __ffssi libgcc function is not exported since it is not listed in libgcc-std.ver. Here are the details: Building the gcj-dbtool linking against libgcj.so the following error is reported: /build2/gcc-4.3-build/

Re: __ffssi2 not exported in libgcc_s.so

2007-05-02 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > If it is ok to simply add that symbol to libgcc-std.ver in which category it > would belong? > I see "# libgcc1 integer symbols" in that file. Would that be appropriate? You add it in the symbol versions for the next release, i.e. under GCC_4.3.0.

RE: Information about LTO

2007-05-02 Thread Sjodin, Jan
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 4:09 PM > To: Sjodin, Jan > Cc: Diego Novillo; Joseph S. Myers; Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: Information about LTO > > On 5/1/07, Sjodin, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Successful build of 4.2.0 RC2 for target=avr host=mingw

2007-05-02 Thread Eric Weddington
...well sort of. If I use the releases straight, I get this: In file included from ../../gcc-4.2.0-20070430/gcc/libgcc2.c:35: ./tm.h:5:29: error: config/avr/avr.h: No such file or directory ./tm.h:6:28: error: config/dbxelf.h: No such file or directory ./tm.h:7:31: error: config/tm-dwarf2.h: No s

Re: GCC 4.2 RC2 Available

2007-05-02 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 20:08:25 Mark Mitchell wrote: > GCC 4.2 RC2 is now available from: > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070430 > > There is a known serious problem with RC2: Ada does not build. > Therefore, there will be an RC3 shortly. there're two more 4.2-only problems w

Re: Backport fix for spurious anonymous ns warnings PR29365 to 4.2?

2007-05-02 Thread Mark Mitchell
Seongbae Park wrote: > On 5/1/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 01 May 2007 14:28:07 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I agree that it would be appropriate to backport the patch to gcc 4.2. >> >> Lets first get the patch which fixes the ICE regression that thi

GCC 4.2.0 RC3 Available

2007-05-02 Thread Mark Mitchell
GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is now available from: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501 This build now contains the fixes for the Ada build problem present in RC2. At this point, I have no plans for an RC4. However, I am reviewing the various open issues, and available patches, so I might ch

Always generate warning/error for assignment as truth value

2007-05-02 Thread Ching, Jimen \(US SSA\)
Hi, I was wondering if there's an option to gcc/g++ to make it generate a warning/error when an assignment is used as a truth value in an expression. The -Wall option does this. But it can be silenced with parentheses. The problem is, macros often use parentheses around expressions. Thus, this w

Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC3 Available

2007-05-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
The RTEMS community is still building and trying to test RC2. We always build with newlib. Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool build and has filed or updated PRs for those. I am now building the complete RTEMS source tree and tests for every board and multilib. The

Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC3 Available

2007-05-02 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joel Sherrill wrote: > Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool > build and has filed or updated PRs for those. Understood, and thnanks for testing! I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities for general testing; they're final release candidates

Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC3 Available

2007-05-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
Mark Mitchell wrote: Joel Sherrill wrote: Ralf encountered problems on the avr and bfin during the tool build and has filed or updated PRs for those. Understood, and thnanks for testing! I should make clear that I don't see release candidates as opportunities for general testing; the

Re: Backport fix for spurious anonymous ns warnings PR29365 to 4.2?

2007-05-02 Thread Seongbae Park
On 5/2/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seongbae Park wrote: > On 5/1/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 01 May 2007 14:28:07 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I agree that it would be appropriate to backport the patch to gcc 4.2. >> >> Lets first