Re: distributing g++

2006-12-16 Thread Denis Vlasenko
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: > Hi > > > What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc > > on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it > > will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true? >

Re: distributing g++

2006-12-16 Thread Denis Vlasenko
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: > Hi > > > What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc > > on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it > > will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true? >

gcc-4.3-20061216 is now available

2006-12-16 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20061216 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20061216/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

relocatable gdb

2006-12-16 Thread Bob Rossi
Hi, I've been responding to an old thread regarding building gcc in mingw so that it can be relocatable. I'm not sure if the discussion should be on gcc-patches, so I'm moving it here. This link has the script I'm running to automate the build, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01181.