I am working on a project that easily and automatically uses Mirrors and
segmented downloading.
Basically, it is an XML file for storing the many links for a file (FTP,
HTTP, P2P - BitTorrent especially). As you can imagine, this is very useful
for accelerated downloading with download managers
> Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> | > Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > Does GCC support any target where the object representation of a
> | > fundamental type T (e.g. int, float, double, pointers) whose all bits
> | > are zero does no
Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > OK, thanks. I was rewriting part of valarray and I saw I made that
| > assumption, and since it is bug chasing time I thought I should make
| > sure my use of memset() isn't going to bomb out.
|
| - If of any help, the c4x's float format is: [ex
I used to use the CodeWarrior compiler on Mac OS 9 and X and then switched
to the GCC compiler. One set of warnings that I sorely miss is that of
implicit type conversions. GCC does offer a ³-Wconversion² warning, but
this warns against type conversions between types in a function prototype
vs. t
I just found the following thread that addresses part of my enhancement
request:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg01270.html
This at least partially addresses the ³shortened conversions² part of my
request. Sorry I didn¹t see that earlier. It sounds like this is an old
request that has neve
On Dec 1, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoffrey Keating) wrote:
> The 'weakref' attribute is defined in terms of aliases. Now,
> if the user writes
> void foo(void) { }
> void bar(void) __attribute__((alias ("foo")));
> then that causes 'bar' to be defined. Other translation units can use
> 'bar'
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:46:39PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Err... The above is a bit misleading, in that it at first appeared to
> be referring to the target of the weakref, not to the weakref itself.
> The weakref may alias to something that is static or not (the whole
> point is being ab
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote
> Paul Schlie writes:
> [...]
> | > OK, thanks. I was rewriting part of valarray and I saw I made that
> | > assumption, and since it is bug chasing time I thought I should make
> | > sure my use of memset() isn't going to bomb out.
> |
> | - If of any help, the c4x's float
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> 2005-09-21 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * lib/split-for-gcj.sh: Cut list to 3 package levels deep.
> I reversed this (patch attached) and now my build with ulimit -v45
> passes. But the total virtual memory usage didn't drop that
On 8 Dec 2005, Nuno Lopes gibbered uncontrollably:
> I need to generate a gcc binary that will always enable the
> -fabi-version=1, because I have a library built with gcc 3.3 and I
> need to link with it, but I would like to use gcc 4.
The libstdc++ ABI broke between these releases, so unless you
For once, the documentation seems to be most accurate; more
accurate than random comments in the code, of which some
contradicts other code:
@item REG_LABEL
This insn uses @var{op}, a @code{code_label} or a @code{note} of type
@code{NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL}, but is not a
@code{jump_insn}, or it is
I started exploring code base of cc1plus, and now I have little
question - how I can get access to tree representation of program (I
should do it after gcc/cp/parser.c:cp_parser_translation unit(...), isnt it?)
If I wasnt mistaken, RTL began build only if parser says that syntax
OK?
--
Best regar
12 matches
Mail list logo
