Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 05:02:11AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > svk depotmap --list shows:
| >
| >Depot Path
| >
| >// /home/gdr/.sv
It looks kike that patch contains a typo
The entry for nonmemory_operand has an extra bogus false
The following patch more than likely fixes the fallout I've just kicked of
a x86_64 bootstrap to find out
Index: gensupport.c
===
---
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:29:36AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> I believe if the file is in a cvs repository and the copy
> in your local tree was not obtained via a checkout, cvs
> will replace the local file with whatever is in the repository.
No, it'll co
Graham Stott wrote:
It looks kike that patch contains a typo
The entry for nonmemory_operand has an extra bogus false
I'm sorry. The patch has been in my powerpc-apple-darwin8.2.0 tree for
months but rs6000 does not use nonmemory_operand. Thanks for fixing it.
Paolo
Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:29:36AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
>> I believe if the file is in a cvs repository and the copy
>> in your local tree was not obtained via a checkout, cvs
>> will replace the local
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:29:36AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> >> I believe if the file is in a cvs repository and the copy
> >> in your local tree was not obt
Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've never seen this, always the collision message, so I guess
> it's version-dependent.
It appears to work only with a local repository.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 N
On Thursday 17 November 2005 23:35, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> I've checked in a patch to fix the comment typo.
Thanks,
What do you thing about adding an assert? Something similar to the attached
patch.
Rafael
Index: gcc/function.c
===
-
Hi,
I am working on some optimizations on the CFG. Can someone please give
me some info on the following -
1. For an gimple expression node, how do we determine the return type?
2. How do we create a temporary variable, and add it to the list of
variables defined in the current function declarati
Hello Everyone,
I am interested in knowing more about the vectorizer in GCC. Does
anyone have or know of any statistics about the percentage of loops
that can be vectorized in some benchmarks like MediaBench, SPEC2K and
so forth?
Thanking You,
Yours Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
lures1
# of expected failures 97
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 234
/werkstatt/georg/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.2.0 20051120 (experimental)
...
.../src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_acats: line 11:
type: gnatmake: not
# svn up
svn: Checksum mismatch for 'gcc/.svn/text-base/ChangeLog.svn-base';
expected: 'ce91f24c15d533874dc494b8fc6b0fde', actual:
'dfd84c36479cfdcd0b6576ecab266817'
U gcc/DATESTAMP
U gcc/tree-gimple.c
U gcc/tree-gimple.h
Thanks for some help.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
Cauchy Song wrote:
># svn up
>
>svn: Checksum mismatch for 'gcc/.svn/text-base/ChangeLog.svn-base';
>expected: 'ce91f24c15d533874dc494b8fc6b0fde', actual:
>'dfd84c36479cfdcd0b6576ecab266817'
>U gcc/DATESTAMP
>U gcc/tree-gimple.c
>U gcc/tree-gimple.h
>
>Thanks for some help.
>
>
>
When I do sv
VIbhav Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am working on some optimizations on the CFG. Can someone please give
> me some info on the following -
>
> 1. For an gimple expression node, how do we determine the return type?
You can get the type of any gimple expression using TREE_TYPE.
> 2. How d
Hi,
I have a question about having multiple insns for one operation. Take
m68k port for example. It has many SImode move insns like so:
(define_insn "pushexthisi_const"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "push_operand" "=m")
(match_operand:SI 1 "const_int_operand" "J"))]
(define_insn ""
[(s
Hi Everyone,
int
main ()
{
int *p;
int i;
p = (int *) malloc (400 * sizeof (int));
for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
{
p[i] = i;
printf ("p[%d]: %d\n", i, p[i]);
}
return 0;
}
The following code should terminate with Segmentation fault, right ?
But when
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> int
> main ()
> {
> int *p;
> int i;
>
> p = (int *) malloc (400 * sizeof (int));
> for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
> {
> p[i] = i;
> printf ("p[%d]: %d\n", i, p[i]);
> }
>return 0;
> }
>
> The following code should terminate wit
> > Second you are invoking undefined behavior by accessing passed the array
> > bounds (or allocated
> > bounds by malloc).
>
> I didnt get your point. I am allocating space only for 400 inregers
> then as soon as in the loop if it crosses the value of 400 , it should
> have given a segementatio
On 11/20/05, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Second you are invoking undefined behavior by accessing passed the array
> > > bounds (or allocated
> > > bounds by malloc).
> >
> > I didnt get your point. I am allocating space only for 400 inregers
> > then as soon as in the loop if it
On 11/20/05, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > int
> > main ()
> > {
> > int *p;
> > int i;
> >
> > p = (int *) malloc (400 * sizeof (int));
> > for (i = 0; i < 512; i++)
> > {
> > p[i] = i;
> > printf ("p[%d]: %d\n", i, p
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> VIbhav Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I am working on some optimizations on the CFG. Can someone please give
>>me some info on the following -
>>
>>1. For an gimple expression node, how do we determine the return type?
>
>
> You can get the type of any gimple e
Since this is a Subversion problem, and not a GCC problem, it would
probably be best to ask this question on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I don't know the answer; I don't see anything in the FAQ or in the
book. So I think this is an excellent question to ask.)
> Running make check stops in the Ada ACATS part,
> where it doesn't find the newly created binaries
> after a successful make bootstrap. (And after turning
> the computer off, going to sleep, turning it on and
> *not* again adding the different GNAT installation to
> PATH that was used for bootstr
23 matches
Mail list logo
