query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ?

Hi, The description about the option -fshort-enums on gcc.gnu.org says, that "-fshort-enums is the default on some targets, as required by the platform ABI." 1) Can anyone tell me, on which all targets, this is default? 2) Or if anyone can tell me any document through which I can find the lis

GCC 4.0.2 Status

Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++ (yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone aware of regressions from previous 4.0.x releases that are wrong-code, ice-on-valid, o

Re: query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ?

"Gaurav Gautam, Noida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) Can anyone tell me, on which all targets, this is default? $ grep -r TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS gcc gcc/config/arm/arm.c:#undef TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS gcc/config/arm/arm.c:#define TARGET_DEFAULT_SHORT_ENUMS arm_default_short_enums gcc/do

reload_in conflicts (Was: Re: [patch RFC] SH: PR target/21623)

Kaz Kojima wrote: Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, I forgot that this is specified to depend on fpscr, and that we are running optimize_mode_switching before reload now. This makes this solution unusable for TARGET_FMOVD. This means we need to go the secondary / tertiary

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:58:46AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++ > (yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a > final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone > aware of regres

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status

H. J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:58:46AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++ >>(yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a >>final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is any

Re: reload-branch created

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Hey Bernd, Has there been any news or progress on reload-branch lately? It removes a lot of code that I'd dearly love to see gone... Unfortunately not. I just don't have the time to work on too many extra projects at the moment :-( Of course, others could always vo

gcc-3.4-20050927 is now available

Snapshot gcc-3.4-20050927 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/3.4-20050927/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 3.4 CVS branch with the following options: -rgcc-ss-3_4-20050927 You'll

Some Question abou libstdc++

Dear, Our organization is planning a big project which is a Linux-Embedded system and will be sold as products in the market. It is necessary for us to choose a C++ Stand Library product. From internet, we found your C++ Stand Library product -- libstdc++, and we are very interested in i

Re: Some Question abou libstdc++

Zhan Zhaohua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Many of your questions are answered here: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html and here: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html > 1. We would like to know wether we have to obtain > some special license or