> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:31:59PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> > No, there isn't, but it might be a smaller change to add a new
> > constraint
> > having constraints tied to specific constants is pretty ugly, and so is
> > having (if (constant value==0)) in a lot of patterns..,,
>
> Tha
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 04:31:59PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> No, there isn't, but it might be a smaller change to add a new
> constraint
> having constraints tied to specific constants is pretty ugly, and so is
> having (if (constant value==0)) in a lot of patterns..,,
That's why you'd
On Sep 30, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
The C constraint on x86 is defined, in both the doc and the comments,
as
"constant that can be easily constructed in SSE register without
loading
from memory". Currently the only one handled is 0, but there is at
least
one more, all 1 bits, wh
> The C constraint on x86 is defined, in both the doc and the comments, as
> "constant that can be easily constructed in SSE register without loading
> from memory". Currently the only one handled is 0, but there is at
> least
> one more, all 1 bits, which is constructed by
>pcmpeqd %xmm, %
The C constraint on x86 is defined, in both the doc and the comments, as
"constant that can be easily constructed in SSE register without loading
from memory". Currently the only one handled is 0, but there is at
least
one more, all 1 bits, which is constructed by
pcmpeqd %xmm, %xmm
Unfor
