Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Just like with any other parts of GCC, you can check out the web docs > and change them yourself. Yes I agree they should be mentioned. That's fair to some extent, but only to some -- if I find an issue with the kernel, I'd hope this _not_ to be Andi's

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Ira Rosen
Hi Andi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/03/2008 18:32:35: > > I noticed the gcc 4.3.0 changes document on the website does not > mention that the vectorizer is now on by default in -O3. > Perhaps that should be added? It seems like an important noteworthy > change to me. Thanks for pointing this

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andi Kleen
Sorry I'm not going through this now, especially not for such a trivialty. My past experiences are that it takes several months of pings to get anything included and I don't have time for that now. -Andi

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:33:01AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry you lost me. You're saying everybody can change gcc SVN now? > > Anyone can submit a patch Well I'm not going to write it because I for once not

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 06:28:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:25:11AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:58:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 10

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry you lost me. You're saying everybody can change gcc SVN now? Anyone can submit a patch -- Pinski

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:25:11AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:58:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:58:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I noticed the gcc 4.3.0 changes document on the website does not > >

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:58:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I noticed the gcc 4.3.0 changes document on the website does not > > mention that the vectorizer is now on by default in -O3. > > Perhaps that should be

Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed the gcc 4.3.0 changes document on the website does not > mention that the vectorizer is now on by default in -O3. > Perhaps that should be added? It seems like an important noteworthy > change to me. Just like

vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing

2008-03-10 Thread Andi Kleen
I noticed the gcc 4.3.0 changes document on the website does not mention that the vectorizer is now on by default in -O3. Perhaps that should be added? It seems like an important noteworthy change to me. I'm not sure it applies to all architectures, but it applies to x86 at least. -Andi